Volume 8, Issue 2 (7-2020)
Jorjani Biomed J 2020, 8(2): 58-72 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bagheri F, Tarokh M J, Ziaratban M. Two-stage Skin Lesion Segmentation from Dermoscopic Images by Using Deep Neural Networks. Jorjani Biomed J 2020; 8 (2) :58-72
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-737-en.html
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-737-en.html
1- Department of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Pardis Street, Molla Sadra Ave, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Pardis Street, Molla Sadra Ave, Tehran, Iran ,f.bagheri@email.kntu.ac.ir
3- Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran
2- Department of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Pardis Street, Molla Sadra Ave, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract: (8590 Views)
Background and objective: Automatic semantic segmentation of skin lesions is one of the most important medical requirements in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer, and scientists always try to achieve more accurate lesion segmentation systems. Developing an accurate model for lesion segmentation helps in timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
Material and Methods: In this study, a two-stage deep learning-based method is presented for accurate segmentation of skin lesions. At the first stage, detection stage, an approximate location of the lesion in a dermoscopy is estimated using deep Yolo v2 network. A sub-image is cropped from the input dermoscopy by considering a margin around the estimated lesion bounding box and then resized to a predetermined normal size. DeepLab convolutional neural network is used at the second stage, segmentation stage, to extract the exact lesion area from the normalized image.
Results: A standard and well-known dataset of dermoscopic images, (ISBI) 2017 dataset, is used to evaluate the proposed method and compare it with the state-of-the-art methods. Our method achieved Jaccard value of 79.05%, which is 2.55% higher than the Jaccard of the winner of the ISIC 2017 challenge.
Conclusion: Experiments demonstrated that the proposed two-stage CNN-based lesion segmentation method outperformed other state-of-the-art methods on the well-known ISIB2017 dataset. High accuracy in detection stage is of most important. Using the detection stage based on Yolov2 before segmentation stage, DeepLab3+ structure with appropriate backbone network, data augmentation, and additional modes of input images are the main reasons of the significant improvement.
Material and Methods: In this study, a two-stage deep learning-based method is presented for accurate segmentation of skin lesions. At the first stage, detection stage, an approximate location of the lesion in a dermoscopy is estimated using deep Yolo v2 network. A sub-image is cropped from the input dermoscopy by considering a margin around the estimated lesion bounding box and then resized to a predetermined normal size. DeepLab convolutional neural network is used at the second stage, segmentation stage, to extract the exact lesion area from the normalized image.
Results: A standard and well-known dataset of dermoscopic images, (ISBI) 2017 dataset, is used to evaluate the proposed method and compare it with the state-of-the-art methods. Our method achieved Jaccard value of 79.05%, which is 2.55% higher than the Jaccard of the winner of the ISIC 2017 challenge.
Conclusion: Experiments demonstrated that the proposed two-stage CNN-based lesion segmentation method outperformed other state-of-the-art methods on the well-known ISIB2017 dataset. High accuracy in detection stage is of most important. Using the detection stage based on Yolov2 before segmentation stage, DeepLab3+ structure with appropriate backbone network, data augmentation, and additional modes of input images are the main reasons of the significant improvement.
Type of Article: Original article |
Subject:
Bio-statistics
Received: 2020/01/1 | Accepted: 2020/05/31 | Published: 2020/07/1
Received: 2020/01/1 | Accepted: 2020/05/31 | Published: 2020/07/1
References
1. National Cancer Institute. SEER Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 15]. Available from: seer.cancer.gov › statfacts › html › melan [Google Scholar]
2. Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong S-J, Thompson JF, Atkins MB, Byrd DR, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27 (36):6199-6206. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3. Binder M, Schwarz M, Winkler A, Steiner A, Kaider A, Wolff KH. Pehamberger, Epiluminescence microscopy: a useful tool for the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions for formally trained dermatologists. Arch Dermatol. 1995;131 (3):286-291.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.131.3.286 [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Celebi ME, Iyatomi H, Schaefer G, Stoecker WV. Lesion border detection in dermoscopy images. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2009;33 (2):148-153. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Ganster H, Pinz P, Rohrer R, Wildling E, Binder M, Kittler H. Automated melanoma recognition. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20 (3):233-239. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Celebi ME, Wen Q, Iyatomi H, Shimizu K, Zhou H, Schaefer G. A state-of-the-art survey on lesion border detection in dermoscopy images. Dermoscopy Image Anal. 2015;97-129. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Al-masni MA, Al-antari MA, Choi M, Han S, Kim T. Skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopy images via deep full resolution convolutional networks. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;162:221-31. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Kwak N-J, Kwon D-J, Kim Y-G, Ahn J-H. Color image segmentation using edge and adaptive threshold value based on the image characteristics. Proc 2004 Int Symp Intell Signal Process Commun Syst 2004 ISPACS 2004. 2004;555-558. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
9. Tan KS, Isa NAM. Color image segmentation using histogram thresholding fuzzy c-means hybrid approach. Pattern Recognit. 2011;44 (1):1-15. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Celebi ME, Kingravi HA, Iyatomi H, Aslandogan YA, Stoecker W V., Moss RH, et al. Border detection in dermoscopy images using statistical region merging. Ski Res Technol. 2008;14(3):347-53. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2014;580-587. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Liu X, Deng Z, Yang Y. Recent progress in semantic image segmentation. Artif Intell Rev [Internet]. 2019;52(2):1089-106. Available from: [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Yan Z, Zhan Y, Peng Z, Liao S, Shinagawa Y, Zhang S. Multi-instance deep learning: Discover discriminative local anatomies for bodypart recognition. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2016;35 (5):1332-1343. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Dou Q, Chen H, Yu L, Zhao L, Qin J, Wang D. Automatic detection of cerebral microbleeds from MR images via 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2016;35 (5):1182-1195. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa RA, Ko J, Swetter SM, Blau HM, et al. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017;542 (7639):115-118. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Pereira S, Pinto A, Alves V, Silva CA. Brain tumor segmentation using convolutional neural networks in MRI images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35 (5):1240-1251. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Avendi M, Kheradvar A, Jafarkhani H. A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI. Med Image Anal. 2016;30:108-119. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Jafari MH, Nasr-Esfahani E, Karimi N, Soroushmehr S, Samavi S, Najarian K. Extraction of skin lesions from non-dermoscopic images using deep learning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(6):1021-30. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Yu L, Chen H, Dou Q, Qin J, Heng P-A. Automated melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images via very deep residual networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36 (4):994-1004. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Li Y, Shen L. Skin lesion analysis towards melanoma detection using deep learning network. Sensors. 2018;18(2 (556)):1-16. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21. Yuan Y, Chao M, Lo Y-C. Automatic skin lesion segmentation using deep fully convolutional networks with Jaccard distance. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36(9):1876-1886. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Yuan Y, Chao M, Lo Y-C. Automatic skin lesion segmentation with fully convolutional-deconvolutional networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017;36 (9):1876-1886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Codella NCF, Gutman D, Celebi ME, Helba B, Marchetti MA, Dusza SW, et al. Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: a Challenge at The 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted By The International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC). arXiv:171005006v3. 2017; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24. ISIC, 2017. Skin lesion analysis towards melanoma detection. available [Accessed 08 02 2018] https//challenge.kitware.com/#challenge/n/%0AISIC_2017%3A_Skin_Lesion_Analysis_Towards_Melanoma_Detection [Internet]. Available from: available: [Accessed 08 02 2018] https://challenge.kitware.com/#challenge/n/%0AISIC_2017%3A_Skin_Lesion_Analysis_Towards_Melanoma_Detection [Google Scholar]
25. DermQuest. The art, science and practice of dermatology. http://www.dermquest.com. 2010; [Google Scholar]
26. Girshick R. Fast R-CNN. Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis. 2015;1440-1448. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. Faster R-CNN : Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015;91-99. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
28. He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, Girshick R. Mask R-CNN. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020;42(2):386-97. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Liu W, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Szegedy C, Reed S, Fu C, et al. SSD : Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Comput Vis - ECCV 2016 Lect Notes Comput Sci vol 9905 Springer, Cham. 2016; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, Farhadi A. You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2016;779-788. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31. Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollar P. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection. arXiv:170802002v2. 2018; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFs. ICLR, 2015. 2015; [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
33. Chen L, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H. Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation. arXiv:180202611v3. 2018; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
34. Chen LC, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017;40(4):834-48. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
35. Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H. Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentation. http://arxiv.org/abs/170605587 [Internet]. 2017; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05587 [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
36. Al-antari MA, Al-masni MA, Park SU, Park JH, Metwally MK, Kadah YM, et al. An automatic computer-aided diagnosis system for breast cancer in digital mammograms via deep belief network. J Med Biol Eng. 2017;1-14. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37. Powers D. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. J Mach Learn Technol. 2011;2 (1):37-63. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
38. Iandola FN, Han S, Moskewicz MW, Ashraf K, Dally WJ, Keutzer K. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size. arXiv:160207360v4 [Internet]. 2016;1-13. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07360 [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
39. Howard AG, Zhu M, Chen B, Kalenichenko D, Wang W, Weyand T, et al. MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications. 2017; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861 [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
40. Chollet F. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. Proc - 30th IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2017. 2017;2017-Janua:1800-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41. Bi L, Kim J, Ahn E, Feng D. Automatic Skin Lesion Analysis using Large-scale Dermoscopy Images and Deep Residual Networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/170304197 [Internet]. 2017;6-9. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04197 [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
42. Lin BS, Michael K, Kalra S, Tizhoosh HR. Skin lesion segmentation: UNets versus clustering. arXiv: 171001248. 2017; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Baghersalimi S, Bozorgtabar B, Schmid-saugeon P, Ekenel HK, Thiran J. DermoNet : densely linked convolutional neural network for efficient skin lesion segmentation. EURASIP J Image Video Process. 2019;71:1-10. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44. Hasan MK, Dahal L, Samarakoon PN, Tushar FI, Martí R. DSNet: Automatic dermoscopic skin lesion segmentation. Comput Biol Med. 2020;120(April):103738. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
45. Cavalcanti PG, Yari Y, Scharcanski J. Pigmented Skin Lesion Segmentation on Macroscopic Images Review of Recent Pigmented Skin Lesion Segmentation Methods. Proceeding ICNZ. 2010; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
46. Cavalcanti PG, Scharcanski J, Lopes CBO. Shading Attenuation in Human Skin Color Images. Adv Vis Comput Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2010;6453:190-8. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
47. Cavalcanti PG, Scharcanski J. Automated prescreening of pigmented skin lesions using standard cameras. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2011;35(6):481-91. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
48. Glaister J, Member S, Wong A, Clausi D a, Member S. Segmentation of Skin Lesions From Digital Images Using Joint Statistical Texture Distinctiveness. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61(4):1220-30. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
49. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proc CVPR. 2015;3431-40. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
50. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Interv. 2015;234-241. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
51. Nasr-Esfahani E, Rafiei S, Jafari MH, Karimi N, Wrobel JS, Soroushmehr SMR, et al. Dense pooling layers in fully convolutional network for skin lesion segmentation. Comput Med Imaging Graph [Internet]. 2019;78:101658. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1712.10207. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
