Volume 7, Issue 4 (12-2019)
Jorjani Biomed J 2019, 7(4): 40-48 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mirhoseini F, Baghestani M, Khajezade M H, Derafshi A, Kaboodsaz yazdi M. location and dimension of mandibular canal on cone beam computed tomography: A cross sectional study. Jorjani Biomed J 2019; 7 (4) :40-48
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-675-en.html
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-675-en.html
location and dimension of mandibular canal on cone beam computed tomography: A cross sectional study
Farzaneh Mirhoseini1 
, Motahare Baghestani 2, Mohammad Hadi Khajezade3 , Ali Derafshi1 , Motahareh Kaboodsaz yazdi1
, Motahare Baghestani 2, Mohammad Hadi Khajezade3 , Ali Derafshi1 , Motahareh Kaboodsaz yazdi1
1- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
2- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , baghestani.motahare@yahoo.com
3- Dentist, Yazd, Iran
2- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran , baghestani.motahare@yahoo.com
3- Dentist, Yazd, Iran
Abstract: (4963 Views)
Background and objective: Accurate understanding of the anatomy of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and its relation with anatomical landmarks of mandibular molar teeth can reduce the risk of unwanted injuries to the IAN during implant placement.
Methods: 44 CBCTs of patients,who have been reffered to the private oral and maxillofacial radiology center, were examined by a radiologist on the axial, sagittal and coronal planes. Then, the distances between mandibular canal and buccal cortex (BN) and lingual cortex (LN), buccolingual width of the mandibular canal (BL), and the distances between the canal and apex of the first molar (M1N) and second molar of mandible (M2N) were obtained from cross-sectional images. Data were analyzed using SPSS17 software and Kolmogorov-smirnov and Mann-whitney test.
Results: 21 males and 23 females aged 20 to 50 years old (mean age: 37.8±7.52) were examined. The mean intervals in the regions of first molar in the right and left sides were BN: 4.03,4.06 mm, LN: 2.10,2.58 mm, BL: 2.20,2.20 mm, and M1N: 5.77,5.78 mm and in the second molar region, on the right and left sides were BN: 5.21,5.20 mm, LN: 1.95,1.80 mm and BL: 2.30,2.20 mm and M2N: 3.85,3.55 mm, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean buccolingual width of mandibular canal in both sides in the region of first molar and left side in the region of second molar between two genders. (P=0.009, P=0.019, P=0.045). Other measurements were not significantly different between two genders (P>0.05). The age range of patients had no effect on any of the distances and measurements (P>0.05).
Conclusion: buccolingual width of mandibular canal in both sides in the region of first molar and left side in the region of second molar was associated with gender.
Methods: 44 CBCTs of patients,who have been reffered to the private oral and maxillofacial radiology center, were examined by a radiologist on the axial, sagittal and coronal planes. Then, the distances between mandibular canal and buccal cortex (BN) and lingual cortex (LN), buccolingual width of the mandibular canal (BL), and the distances between the canal and apex of the first molar (M1N) and second molar of mandible (M2N) were obtained from cross-sectional images. Data were analyzed using SPSS17 software and Kolmogorov-smirnov and Mann-whitney test.
Results: 21 males and 23 females aged 20 to 50 years old (mean age: 37.8±7.52) were examined. The mean intervals in the regions of first molar in the right and left sides were BN: 4.03,4.06 mm, LN: 2.10,2.58 mm, BL: 2.20,2.20 mm, and M1N: 5.77,5.78 mm and in the second molar region, on the right and left sides were BN: 5.21,5.20 mm, LN: 1.95,1.80 mm and BL: 2.30,2.20 mm and M2N: 3.85,3.55 mm, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean buccolingual width of mandibular canal in both sides in the region of first molar and left side in the region of second molar between two genders. (P=0.009, P=0.019, P=0.045). Other measurements were not significantly different between two genders (P>0.05). The age range of patients had no effect on any of the distances and measurements (P>0.05).
Conclusion: buccolingual width of mandibular canal in both sides in the region of first molar and left side in the region of second molar was associated with gender.
Type of Article: Original article |
Subject:
General medicine
Received: 2019/05/28 | Accepted: 2019/09/29 | Published: 2019/12/1
Received: 2019/05/28 | Accepted: 2019/09/29 | Published: 2019/12/1
References
1. Razavi S.H BS, Sarikhani khorami Kh, Kaboodsaz yazdi M, Namiranian. The evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images: A cross-sectional study. Jorjani Biomed J. 2019;7(3):56-67. [Google Scholar]
2. Dos Santos Oliveira R, Maria Gomes Oliveira A, Cintra Junqueira JL, Kühl Panzarella F. Association between the Anatomy of the Mandibular Canal and Facial Types: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Analysis. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:5481383-. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3. Wang D, Lin T, Wang Y, Sun C, Yang L, Jiang H, et al. Radiographic features of anatomic relationship between impacted third molar and inferior alveolar canal on coronal CBCT images: risk factors for nerve injury after tooth extraction. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14(3):532-40. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Barzanji H, & Tahir, A. Evaluation of the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury during an implant procedure: A comparative study between OPG and CBCT. Erbil Dental Journal (EDJ). 2019;2(1):141-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Patel P, Shah J, Dudhia B, Butala P, Jani Y, Macwan R. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2020;31(1):91-102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Ogawa H, Kawashima Y. Location and Size of Mandibular Canal and Cortical Bone Width in the Second Molar Region. International Journal of Oral-Medical Sciences. 2019;17(3-4):53-61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Adiguzel O, Yigit-Ozer S, Kaya S, Akkus Z. Patient-specific factors in the proximity of the inferior alveolar nerve to the tooth apex. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2012;17(6):e1103-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Sheng L, Qu W, Li Y, Qu Z, Wang J. [Three-dimensional survey of the whole mandibular canal and mandibular morphology by cone beam computed tomography in normal young people]. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology. 2016;34(2):156-61. [Google Scholar]
9. Yashar N, Engeland CG, Rosenfeld AL, Walsh TP, Califano JV. Radiographic considerations for the regional anatomy in the posterior mandible. Journal of periodontology. 2012;83(1):36-42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Kim ST, Hu KS, Song WC, Kang MK, Park HD, Kim HJ. Location of the mandibular canal and the topography of its neurovascular structures. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(3):936-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Nair UP, Yazdi MH, Nayar GM, Parry H, Katkar RA, Nair MK. Configuration of the inferior alveolar canal as detected by cone beam computed tomography. J Conserv Dent. 2013;16(6):518-21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Kawashima Y, Sakai O, Shosho D, Kaneda T, Gohel A. Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to Teeth and Cortical Bone. Journal of endodontics. 2016;42(2):221-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Koivisto T, Chiona D, Milroy LL, McClanahan SB, Ahmad M, Bowles WR. Mandibular Canal Location: Cone-beam Computed Tomography Examination. Journal of endodontics. 2016;42(7):1018-21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Balaji SM, Krishnaswamy NR, Kumar SM, Rooban T. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position among South Indians: A cone beam computed tomographic pilot study. Annals of maxillofacial surgery. 2012;2(1):51-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
