1. Reade-Christopher, S.J. and L.L. Kupper, Effects of exposure misclassification on regression analyses of epidemiologic follow-up study data. Biometrics, 1991: p. 535-548.
2. Teschke, K., et al., Occupational exposure assessment in case–control studies: opportunities for improvement. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 2002. 59(9): p. 575-594.
3. Prescott, G.J. and P.H. Garthwaite, Bayesian analysis of misclassified binary data from a matched case–control study with a validation sub‐study. Statistics in medicine, 2005. 24(3): p. 379-401.
4. Liu, J., et al., Bayesian analysis of a matched case–control study with expert prior information on both the misclassification of exposure and the exposure–disease association. Statistics in medicine, 2009. 28(27): p. 3411-3423
5. Espino-Hernandez, G., P. Gustafson, and I. Burstyn, Bayesian adjustment for measurement error in continuous exposures in an individually matched case-control study. BMC medical research methodology, 2011. 11(1): p. 67.
6. Clayton, D., M. Hills, and A. Pickles, Statistical models in epidemiology. Vol. 161. 1993: IEA.
7. Gustafson, P., Measurement error and misclassification in statistics and epidemiology: impacts and Bayesian adjustments. 2003: CRC Press
8. Roeder, K., R.J. Carroll, and B.G. Lindsay, A semiparametric mixture approach to case-control studies with errors in covariables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1996. 91(434): p. 722-732.
9. Müller, P. and K. Roeder, A Bayesian semiparametric model for case-control studies with errors in variables. Biometrika, 1997. 84(3): p. 523-537.
10. Gustafson, P., N.D. Le, and R. Saskin, Case–control analysis with partial knowledge of exposure misclassification probabilities. Biometrics, 2001. 57(2): p. 598-609.
11. Gustafson, P., N.D. Le, and M. Vallée, A Bayesian approach to case–control studies with errors in covariables. Biostatistics, 2002. 3(2): p. 229-243.
12. Rice, K., Full‐likelihood approaches to misclassification of a binary exposure in matched case‐control studies. Statistics in medicine, 2003. 22(20): p. 3177-3194
13. Rice, K., Equivalence between conditional and random-effects likelihoods for pair-matched case-control studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2008. 103(481).
14. Rice, K., On Bayesian analysis of misclassified data from a matched case‐control study with a validation sub‐study by Gordon J. Prescott and Paul H. Garthwaite. Statistics in medicine, 2006. 25(3): p. 537-539.
15. Rice, K.M., Equivalence between conditional and mixture approaches to the Rasch model and matched case-control studies, with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2004. 99(466): p. 510-522.
16. Breslow, N.E. and N.E. Day, Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 2. 1987: International Agency for Research on Cancer Lyon.
17. Tse, L.A., et al., Occupational risks and lung cancer burden for Chinese men: a population-based case-referent study. Cancer Causes Control, 2012. 23: p. 121-131.
18. Lenters, V., et al, Endotoxin exposure and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature on agriculture and cotton textile workers. Cancer Causes Control, 2010. 21(4): p. 523-555.
19. Vida, S., et al., Occupational Exposure to Silica and Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Two Case-Control Studies in Montreal, Canada. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prevention, 2010. 19: p. 1602-1611.
20. Gandini, S., et al, Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis. 2008. 122: p. 155-164.
21. MR, M., et al., Opium could Be Considered an Independent Risk Factor for Lung cancer: A Case-Control Study. Respiration, 2012.
22. Martin, J.C., et al., Occupational Risk Factors for Lung cancer in French Electricity and Gas. American journal of Epidemiology, 2000. 151(9).
23. Tse, L.A., et al., Occupational risks and lung cancer burden for Chinese men: a population-based case–referent study. Cancer Causes & Control, 2012. 23(1): p. 121-131.
24. Diamond, E.L. and A.M. Lilienfeld, Effects of errors in classification and diagnosis in various types of epidemiological studies. American Journal of Public Health and the Nations Health, 1962. 52(7): p. 1137-1144.
25. Gustafson, P. and S. Greenland, Curious phenomena in Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification. Statistics in medicine, 2006. 25(1): p. 87-103.