Volume 10, Issue 1 (3-2022)
Jorjani Biomed J 2022, 10(1): 13-25 |
Back to browse issues page
1- Medical Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Medical Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , drsheikharabi.m@goums.ac.ir
2- Medical Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , drsheikharabi.m@goums.ac.ir
Abstract: (2989 Views)
One of the major challenges in the field of tissue engineering is the production of scaffolding in nano-scale. The study of structural-functional connections in pathological and normal tissues with biologically active alternatives or engineered materials has been developed. Extracellular Matrix (ECM) is a suitable environment consisting of gelatin, elastin and collagen types I, II and III, etc., which are provided to cells for wound healing, embryonic development, cell growth and organogenesis, and. They also play a role in transmitting structural integrity and overall strength to tissues. In tissues, ECM manufacturers are structurally 50 to 500 nm in diameter; nanotechnology must be used to create scaffolds or ECM analogues. Recent advances in nanotechnology have led to the development of ECM-engineered analogues in various ways. To date, three self-assembly, phase separation and electrospinning techniques have been developed to activate nanofiber scaffolds. With these advances and the construction of a "biomimetic" environment, engineered tissue or scaffolding is now possible for a variety of tissues. This study will discuss the three existing methods for creating Tissue engineering scaffolds that are able to mimic new tissue, as well as the discovery of materials for use in scaffolding.
Full-Text [PDF 823 kb]
(836 Downloads)
| | Full-Text (HTML) (1089 Views)
Phase separation, self-assembly and electrospinning are common and easy methods for producing nanofibers.
The imitation of extracellular matrix architecture is one of the challenges of cell culture.
The imitation of extracellular matrix architecture is one of the challenges of cell culture.
Type of Article: Review Article |
Subject:
Basic Medical Sciences
Received: 2022/01/3 | Accepted: 2022/01/23 | Published: 2022/03/30
Received: 2022/01/3 | Accepted: 2022/01/23 | Published: 2022/03/30
References
1. Antman-Passig M, Shefi O. Remote Magnetic Orientation of 3D Collagen Hydrogels for Directed Neuronal Regeneration. Nano Lett. 2015 Mar 3;16. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Cao H, Liu T, Chew SY. The application of nanofibrous scaffolds in neural tissue engineering. Nanofibers Regen Med Drug Deliv. 2009 Oct 5;61(12):1055-64. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes CP, Sell SA, Boland ED, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Nanofiber technology: Designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Intersect Nanosci Mod Surf Anal Methodol. 2007 Dec 10;59(14):1413-33. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Amirabadi HE, SahebAli S, Frimat J, Luttge R, Den Toonder J. A novel method to understand tumor cell invasion: integrating extracellular matrix mimicking layers in microfluidic chips by "selective curing." Biomed Microdevices. 2017;19(4):1-11. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
5. Abdollahiyan P, Oroojalian F, Mokhtarzadeh A. The triad of nanotechnology, cell signalling, and scaffold implantation for the successful repair of damaged organs: An overview on soft-tissue engineering. J Controlled Release. 2021; [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Kaczmarek B, Nadolna K, Owczarek A. The physical and chemical properties of hydrogels based on natural polymers. Hydrogels Based Nat Polym. 2020;151-72. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Dowaidar M. Carbon nanofibers assist in the manufacture of prosthetic joints, promote tissue, organ, nerve regeneration and development, and improve anticancer therapy impact and chemosensitization for a range of tumor types. 2021; [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Muthukrishnan L. Imminent antimicrobial bioink deploying cellulose, alginate, EPS and synthetic polymers for 3D bioprinting of tissue constructs. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;117774. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Foster NC, Hall NM, El Haj AJ. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cartilage Model Platforms for Drug Evaluation and High-Throughput Screening Assays. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2021; [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Afewerki S, Sheikhi A, Kannan S, Ahadian S, Khademhosseini A. Gelatin‐polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: towards natural therapeutics. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019;4(1):96-115. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
11. Saleh F, Harb A, Soudani N, Zaraket H. A three-dimensional A549 cell culture model to study respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(8):1142-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Moohan J, Stewart SA, Espinosa E, Rosal A, Rodríguez A, Larrañeta E, et al. Cellulose nanofibers and other biopolymers for biomedical applications. A review. Appl Sci. 2020;10(1):65. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Ohkawa K, Hayashi S, Nishida A, Yamamoto H, Ducreux J. Preparation of Pure Cellulose Nanofiber via Electrospinning. Text Res J. 2009;79(15):1396-401. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Phuong V, Verstichel S, Cinelli P, Anguillesi I, Coltelli M, Lazzeri A. Cellulose Acetate Blends - Effect of Plasticizers on Properties and Biodegradability. J Renew Mater. 2014 Feb 19;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Jaeger R, Bergshoef MM, Batlle CMI, Schönherr H, Julius Vancso G. Electrospinning of ultra-thin polymer fibers. Macromol Symp. 1998 Feb 1;127(1):141-50. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Park J-Y, Kim J-I, Lee I-H. Fabrication and Characterization of Antimicrobial Ethyl Cellulose Nanofibers Using Electrospinning Techniques. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015 Aug 1;15:5672-5. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Ghorani B, Russell SJ, Goswami P. Controlled Morphology and Mechanical Characterisation of Electrospun Cellulose Acetate Fibre Webs. Lee W-F, editor. Int J Polym Sci. 2013 Apr 4;2013:256161. [DOI]
18. Lavinia Vlaia. Cellulose-Derivatives-Based Hydrogels as Vehicles for Dermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery. In: Georgeta Coneac, editor. Emerging Concepts in Analysis and Applications of Hydrogels [Internet]. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 16]. p. Ch. 7. Available from: [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Shukla S, Brinley E, Cho HJ, Seal S. Electrospinning of hydroxypropyl cellulose fibers and their application in synthesis of nano and submicron tin oxide fibers. Polymer. 2005;46(26):12130-45. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Chun M-K, Kwak B-T, Choi H-K. Preparation of buccal patch composed of carbopol, poloxamer and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Arch Pharm Res. 2003;26(11):973-8. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Das B, Chatterjee A. Salt-induced counterion condensation and related phenomena in sodium carboxymethylcellulose-sodium halide-methanol-water quaternary systems. Soft Matter. 2015;11(20):4133-40. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Chatterjee A, Das B, Das C. Polyion-counterion interaction behavior for sodium carboxymethylcellulose in methanol-water mixed solvent media. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(2):1144-52. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Pradhan S, Moore KM, Ainslie KM, Yadavalli VK. Flexible, microstructured surfaces using chitin-derived biopolymers. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(35):5328-35. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Zhong T, Liu W, Liu H. Green electrospinning of chitin propionate to manufacture nanofiber mats. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;273:118593. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Mallik AK, Sakib MN, Shaharuzzaman M, Haque P, Rahman MM. Chitin nanomaterials: preparation and surface modifications. Handb Chitin Chitosan Vol 1 Prep Prop. 2020;165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26. Qasim SB, Zafar MS, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Shah AH, Husain S, et al. Electrospinning of chitosan-based solutions for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):407. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
27. Chen Q, Wu J, Liu Y, Li Y, Zhang C, Qi W, et al. Electrospun chitosan/PVA/bioglass Nanofibrous membrane with spatially designed structure for accelerating chronic wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;105:110083. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Abdelghany A, Menazea A, Ismail A. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol blend doped with Hibiscus Sabdariffa L. extract. J Mol Struct. 2019;1197:603-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Tang S, Liu J-D, Chen W, Huang S-H, Zhang J, Bai Z-W. Performance comparison of chiral separation materials derived from N-cyclohexylcarbonyl and N-hexanoyl chitosans. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1532:112-23. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Nichifor M, Stanciu MC, Doroftei F. Self-assembly of dextran-b-deoxycholic acid polyester copolymers: Copolymer composition and self-assembly procedure tune the aggregate size and morphology. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;252:117147. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
31. Hosseinzadeh S, Zarei-Behjani Z, Bohlouli M, Khojasteh A, Ghasemi N, Salehi-Nik N. Fabrication and optimization of bioactive cylindrical scaffold prepared by electrospinning for vascular tissue engineering. Iran Polym J. 2021;1-15. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Lyakhovich Y. Silk as a Biomaterial for Tissue-Engineered Vascular Conduits. McGill University (Canada); 2019. [Google Scholar]
33. Chen W, Zhou S, Ge L, Wu W, Jiang X. Translatable high drug loading drug delivery systems based on biocompatible polymer nanocarriers. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(6):1732-45. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
34. Abou-Okeil A, Fahmy H, Fouda MM, Aly A, Ibrahim H. Hyaluronic Acid/Oxidized К-Carrageenan Electrospun Nanofibers Synthesis and Antibacterial Properties. BioNanoScience. 2021;11(3):687-95. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
35. Tan Z, Jiang Y, Zhang W, Karls L, Lodge TP, Reineke TM. Polycation architecture and assembly direct successful gene delivery: Micelleplexes outperform polyplexes via optimal DNA packaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(40):15804-17. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
36. Gu X, Li N, Luo J, Xia X, Gu H, Xiong J. Electrospun polyurethane microporous membranes for waterproof and breathable application: the effects of solvent properties on membrane performance. Polym Bull. 2018;75(8):3539-53. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37. Subramani NK, Shivanna S, Nagaraj SK, Suresha B, Raj BJ, Siddaramaiah H. Optoelectronic Behaviours of UV shielding Calcium ZirconateReinforced Polycarbonate Nanocomposite Films: An Optical View. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(8):16626-32. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38. Pramanik C, Jamil T, Gissinger JR, Guittet D, Arias‐Monje PJ, Kumar S, et al. Polyacrylonitrile interactions with carbon nanotubes in solution: Conformations and binding as a function of solvent, temperature, and concentration. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(50):1905247. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
39. Resendiz-Lara DA, Stubbs NE, Arz MI, Pridmore NE, Sparkes HA, Manners I. Boron-nitrogen main chain analogues of polystyrene: poly (B-aryl) aminoboranes via catalytic dehydrocoupling. Chem Commun. 2017;53(85):11701-4. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
40. Alarfaj NA, Amina M, Al Musayeib NM, El-Tohamy MF, Oraby HF, Bukhari SI, et al. Prospective of Green Synthesized Oleum cumini Oil/PVP/MgO Bionanocomposite Film for Its Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anticancer Applications. J Polym Environ. 2020;28(8). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41. Hongthipwaree T, Sriamornsak P, Seadan M, Suttiruengwong S. Effect of cosolvent on properties of non-woven porous neomycin-loaded poly (lactic acid)/polycaprolactone fibers. Mater Today Sustain. 2020;10:100051. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
42. Tavares TB, de Sousa FF, Sales MJ, Paterno LG, Paschoal W, Moreira SG. Optical and morphological features of poly (vinyl carbazole)/ferrite composites for potential opto-electronic applications. Appl Phys A. 2021;127(11):1-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Zhu C, Zhu J, Wang C, Chen R, Sun L, Ru C. Wrinkle-free, sandwich, electrospun PLGA/SF nanofibrous scaffold for skin tissue engineering. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol. 2018;17(4):675-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44. Maghdouri-White Y, Bowlin GL, Lemmon CA, Dréau D. Bioengineered silk scaffolds in 3D tissue modeling with focus on mammary tissues. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:1168-80. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
45. Wolf K, Alexander S, Schacht V, Coussens LM, von Andrian UH, van Rheenen J, et al. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. In Elsevier; 2009. p. 931-41. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
46. Yang Z, Xu H, Zhao X. Designer self‐assembling peptide hydrogels to engineer 3D cell microenvironments for cell constructs formation and precise oncology remodeling in ovarian cancer. Adv Sci. 2020;7(9):1903718. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
47. Bello AB, Kim D, Kim D, Park H, Lee S-H. Engineering and functionalization of gelatin biomaterials: From cell culture to medical applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020;26(2):164-80. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
48. Cheng L, Yao B, Hu T, Cui X, Shu X, Tang S, et al. Properties of an alginate-gelatin-based bioink and its potential impact on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;135:1107-13. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
49. Abbasi H, Fahim H, Mahboubi M. Fabrication and characterization of composite film based on gelatin and electrospun cellulose acetate fibers incorporating essential oil. J Food Me :as char: act. 2021;15(2):2108-18. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
50. Li H, Tan YJ, Li L. A strategy for strong interface bonding by 3D bioprinting of oppositely charged κ-carrageenan and gelatin hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;198:261-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
51. Li D, Zhang K, Shi C, Liu L, Yan G, Liu C, et al. Small molecules modified biomimetic gelatin/hydroxyapatite nanofibers constructing an ideal osteogenic microenvironment with significantly enhanced cranial bone formation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:7167. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
52. Mowbray S. Investigation of Organ Level Muscle Properties and Mechanics Through Modeling Fiber Architecture of Soft Tissue Muscle Groups and the Effect of Necrotic Tissue on Muscle Fiber Orientation. 2021; [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
53. Padaki M, Subrahmanya T, Prasad D, Jadhav AH. Electrospun Nanofibers: Role of Nanofibers in Water Remediation and Effect of Experimental Variables on their Nano topography and Application Processes. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2021; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
54. Teixeira MA, Amorim MTP, Felgueiras HP. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-based nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polymers. 2020;12(1):7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
55. Zhang Q, Wang X, Fu J, Liu R, He H, Ma J, et al. Electrospinning of ultrafine conducting polymer composite nanofibers with diameter less than 70 nm as high sensitive gas sensor. Materials. 2018;11(9):1744. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
56. Ghaderpour A, Hoseinkhani Z, Yarani R, Mohammadiani S, Amiri F, Mansouri K. Altering the characterization of nanofibers by changing the electrospinning parameters and their application in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and gene delivery systems. Polym Adv Technol. 2021;32(5):1924-50. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
57. Bhattarai RS, Bachu RD, Boddu SH, Bhaduri S. Biomedical applications of electrospun nanofibers: Drug and nanoparticle delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(1):5. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
58. Hai T, Wan X, Yu D-G, Wang K, Yang Y, Liu Z-P. Electrospun lipid-coated medicated nanocomposites for an improved drug sustained-release profile. Mater Des. 2019;162:70-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
59. He Z, Rault F, Lewandowski M, Mohsenzadeh E, Salaün F. Electrospun PVDF nanofibers for piezoelectric applications: A review of the influence of electrospinning parameters on the β phase and crystallinity enhancement. Polymers. 2021;13(2):174. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
60. Barhoum A, Pal K, Rahier H, Uludag H, Kim IS, Bechelany M. Nanofibers as new-generation materials: from spinning and nano-spinning fabrication techniques to emerging applications. Appl Mater Today. 2019;17:1-35. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
61. Rahmati M, Mills DK, Urbanska AM, Saeb MR, Venugopal JR, Ramakrishna S, Mozafari M. Electrospinning for tissue engineering applications. Progress in Materials Science. 2021 Apr 1;117:100721. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
62. Ariga K, Jia X, Song J, Hill JP, Leong DT, Jia Y, et al. Nanoarchitectonics beyond self‐assembly: challenges to create bio‐like hierarchic organization. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(36):15424-46. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
63. Fan L, Wang X, Wu D. Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes (POSS)‐based Hybrid Materials: Molecular Design, Solution Self‐Assembly and Biomedical Applications. Chin J Chem. 2021;39(3):757-74. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
64. De Groot SC, Sliedregt K, Van Benthem PPG, Rivolta MN, Huisman MA. Building an Artificial Stem Cell Niche: Prerequisites for Future 3D‐Formation of Inner Ear Structures-Toward 3D Inner Ear Biotechnology. Anat Rec. 2020;303(3):408-26. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
65. Bueno A, Luebbert C, Enders S, Sadowski G, Smirnova I. Production of polylactic acid aerogels via phase separation and supercritical CO2 drying: thermodynamic analysis of the gelation and drying process. J Mater Sci. 2021;1-20. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
66. Salgado M, Santos F, Rodríguez-Rojo S, Reis RL, Duarte ARC, Cocero MJ. Development of barley and yeast β-glucan aerogels for drug delivery by supercritical fluids. J CO2 Util. 2017;22:262-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
67. Grenier J, Duval H, Barou F, Lv P, David B, Letourneur D. Mechanisms of pore formation in hydrogel scaffolds textured by freeze-drying. Acta Biomater. 2019;94:195-203. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
68. Chu B, He J, Wang Z, Liu L, Li X, Wu C-X, et al. Proangiogenic peptide nanofiber hydrogel/3D printed scaffold for dermal regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2021;424:128146. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
69. Nandihalli N, Liu C-J, Mori T. Polymer based thermoelectric nanocomposite materials and devices: Fabrication and characteristics. Nano Energy. 2020;105186. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
70. Liu Y, Xie J, Wu N, Wang L, Ma Y, Tong J. Influence of silane treatment on the mechanical, tribological and morphological properties of corn stalk fiber reinforced polymer composites. Tribol Int. 2019;131:398-405. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
71. Mbundi L, Gonzalez-Perez M, Gonzalez-Perez F, Juanes-Gusano D, Rodriguez-Cabello JC. Trends in the Development of Tailored Elastin-Like Recombinamer-Based Porous Biomaterials for Soft and Hard Tissue Applications. Front Mater 7 601795 Doi 103389fmats. 2021; [DOI] [Google Scholar]
72. Croce S, Peloso A, Zoro T, Avanzini MA, Cobianchi L. A hepatic scaffold from decellularized liver tissue: food for thought. Biomolecules. 2019;9(12):813. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
73. Hokmabad VR, Davaran S, Aghazadeh M, Rahbarghazi R, Salehi R, Ramazani A. Fabrication and characterization of novel ethyl cellulose-grafted-poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/alginate nanofibrous/macroporous scaffolds incorporated with nano-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl. 2019;33(8):1128-44. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
74. Huang L, Huang J, Shao H, Hu X, Cao C, Fan S, et al. Silk scaffolds with gradient pore structure and improved cell infiltration performance. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;94:179-89. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
75. Chen C-H, Li D-L, Chuang AD-C, Dash BS, Chen J-P. Tension Stimulation of Tenocytes in Aligned Hyaluronic Acid/Platelet-Rich Plasma-Polycaprolactone Core-Sheath Nanofiber Membrane Scaffold for Tendon Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(20):11215. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
76. Sensi F, D’Angelo E, D’Aronco S, Molinaro R, Agostini M. Preclinical three‐dimensional colorectal cancer model: The next generation of in vitro drug efficacy evaluation. Journal of cellular physiology. 2019 Jan;234(1):181-91. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
77. Foglietta F, Canaparo R, Muccioli G, Terreno E, Serpe L. Methodological aspects and pharmacological applications of three-dimensional cancer cell cultures and organoids. Life Sci. 2020;254:117784. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |