Volume 10, Issue 1 (3-2022)                   Jorjani Biomed J 2022, 10(1): 13-25 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

kheyrandish M, Bafande F, Sheikh Arabi M. Features and Methods of Making Nanofibers by Electrospinning, Phase Separation and Self-assembly. Jorjani Biomed J 2022; 10 (1) :13-25
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-879-en.html
1- Medical Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran
2- Medical Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , drsheikharabi.m@goums.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 823 kb]   (834 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (2985 Views)
 Phase separation, self-assembly and electrospinning are common and easy methods for producing nanofibers.
 The imitation of extracellular matrix architecture is one of the challenges of cell culture.
 
Full-Text:   (1083 Views)
Highlights
  • Phase separation, self-assembly and electrospinning are common and easy methods for producing nanofibers.
  • The imitation of extracellular matrix architecture is one of the challenges of cell culture.
 Introduction
This review discusses the design of scaffolds having nanoscale features for collagen, fibrin, fibrinogen, chitosan, elastin, gelatin and cellulose are biopolymers nanofibers (are now emerging as one class of important nanomaterials) represent a practical approach to control cellular migration and orientation in cell culture (1,2). The advantage of natural polymers is that they are very similar to macromolecules in the body (3). The imitation of extracellular matrix architecture is one of the challenges of cell culture (4). In this regard, scientists are using the principle of nanotechnology to design and build nano scaffolds that are capable of replacing ECMs as well as to repair damaged tissues (5). One of the disadvantages of natural polymers, such as hyaluronic acid, is that they are mechanically weak and require processing to separate these polymers (6).
The study of cancer metastasis is limited due to weakness in tumor molecular progression. The types of biological molecules, such as growth hormones that are made up of scaffold have a positive effect on cell growth, proliferation, and function (7). Fine fibers made by electrostatic force have been discussed, investigated, and patented since the late 18th century (Table1). Nowadays, various types of natural and synthetic polymers are available in 3D fiber scaffolding (8) (Table 2). Three-dimensional (3D) culture platforms are able to mimic indoor environments, which are more physiologically important than conventional two-dimensional (2D) cultures (9). To connect cell-cell and cell-ECM, porous 3D structures are designed similar to natural ECM; the use of 3D culture medium has the ability to evaluate the impact of materials and environmental conditions that can be changed, which is an advantage of using 3D culture over the animal model (10). And the 3D cell culture model creates a bridge between the 2D cell culture and the animal model (11). Because of the advantage of nanofiber biopolymers for 3D cell culture template synthesis and It is not able to produce continuous fibers that can withstand the applied stresses, we introduce three main methods to produce nanofibers: electrospinning, self-assembly and phase separation (12).
 
Table 1. History of Electrospun development of nanofibers.
Year Progress of Electrospinning technology
1902 Electrospinning as a solution
1980 Electrospinning as a melt
1999 Preparation of Electrospining Nanocomposites
2000 Electrospining Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering
2003 Electrospun Nanofibers on an axis
2005 Electrospinning Nanofibers as a emulsion
2012 Electrospun Nanoyarn
2014 Preparation of 3D porous electrospun compounded with freeze-drying technology
 
 
Table 2. Polymers in electrospun process
Polymer   Solvent Applications References
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Polysaccharides
and derivatives
Cellulose N-methyl morpholine oxide or NMMO Textile, as food additives, paper, plastic (13)
Cellulose acetate Acetone Textile, as food additives, paper, plastic (14,15)
Ethyl cellulose Tetrahydro Furan (THF)/
Dimethyl Acetamide (DMA)
As a carrier for loading of functional material (16)
Propionyl cellulose Acetone As a carrier for delivery (17)
Methyl cellulose Ethanol/water As a carrier for delivery (18)
Hydroxypropyl
cellulose
Anhydrous ethanol As a carrier for delivery (19)
Hydroxypropyl
methyl cellulose
Ethanol/water As a carrier for delivery (20)
Carboxymethylcellulose Methanol/water As a carrier for delivery (21,22)
chitin                                    1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-2-
propanol or HFIP
Tissue engineering and wound healing (23)
Practical grade chitin 1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-2-
propanol or HFIP
Tissue engineering and wound healing (24)
Chitin/PGA 1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-2-
propanol or HFIP
Tissue engineering and wound healing (25)
Chitin/silk fibroin 1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-2-
propanol or HFIP
Textile and clothing (26)
Chitosan Trifluoroacetic Acid (TFA)
Ethanol/water
Wound healing (27)
Chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) Aqueous acetic acid Wound healing (28)
Hexanoyl chitosan Chloroform Wound healing (29)
Dextran Water and DMSO Adhesion of some
functional material
(30)
Protein Collagen with
gelatin/poly ethylene oxide
1,1,1,3,3,3-
hexafluoro-2-
propanol or HFIP
Tissue engineering and wound healing (31)
Silk/PEO Formic acid Fabric industry (32)
Casein/poly ethylene oxide Tetrahydrofuran Food supplement (33)
Zein/hyaluronic
acid/PVA
Ethanol/water Medical application (34)
Nucleic acid DNA Ethanol or water Gene Delivery (35)
Synthetic and semisynthetic polymers Polyurethanes DMF Protective clothing (36)
Polycarbonate Dichloromethane Sensor and filter (37)
Polyacrylonitrile DMF Carbon nanotubes (38)
Poly styrene Tetrahydrofuran catalyst (39)
PVP Tetrahydrofuran Antimicrobial agent (40)
Polylactic acid Dichloromethane delivery system (41)
Polyvinyl carbazole Dichloromethane Sensor, filter (42)
PLGA Tetrahydrofuran Scaffold for tissue engineering (43)
 
Materials used in 3D culture
In 3D culture, there is a strong emphasis on the use of gelatin, elastin and collagen scaffolds. The structure of collagen provides a suitable biological space for the growth of cells, organs and fetal (44). The collagen in ECM can be separated from a native origin and does not excite the immune system (45). Cell-ECM binding, proliferation and differentiation in tissue engineering, is directly related to the structure of the fiber-like collagen, also the pattern of scaffold construction is the body's natural tissue ECM (46). Gelatin is a natural polymer that is almost identical in composition and biological properties to collagen. Gelatin can be used alone or in combination with a degradable polymer to produce nanofibers for tissue scaffolding, wound healing, and other medical applications (47). Gelatin's behavior is similar to that of other proteins in that it supports cellular supplement, migration and proliferation of cell (48). The structure of gelatin dissolves in water, but if we want to produce ultra-fine fibers for electrospinning, we cannot use a mixture of water and gelatin (49). Because the structure of gelatin should not be dissolved in water at 37°C or higher or congealing at low temperatures in the gel, its structure should be stable (50). Unfortunately, the combination of water with gelatin cannot be used in electrospinning. Moreover, Gelatin is a kind of colloidal solution that is not suitable for tissue scaffolding without cross-linking (51) (Figure 1). There are two types of protein in the human body that have amazing biological properties, like elastin that known as most linear elastic biosolid (52).

Figure 1. Dissolution of cationic gelatin in water and formation of cross-links between gelatin particles
Electrospinning
Nano-scale nanofibers are produced by electrospinning, in a high-voltage electric field a solution is thrown from the tip of a spinneret to the plate. The advantages of this method are low cost, simplicity and fastness, which are used for the production of nanoscale and micro-scale also, the products that produced by this method have high surface-to-volume ratio and porosity, that is required for three-dimensional culture (53). Electrospinning is widely used for the production of polymeric scaffold for 3D culture for tissue engineering because of its structure similar to ECM (54). The use of this technique gives us the opportunity to determine the thickness of the nanofibers, the porosity and the composition of the nanofibers. In this method, in a large area, the diameter of the nanofibers can be reduced from micrometers to nanometers (55). The high surface area and high porosity in this method allow optimal cellular interaction and therefore allow potential scaffolding. The use of an electric field to design a polymer solution or melt from a hole to a collector is the basis of electrospinning using electric potential in a polymer solution, nanofibers with a diameter of 50 to 1000 nanometers can be produced (56). Due to the surface tension and the electric potential for loading in the polymer solution the solution is kept at the tip of a tube with a capillary structure, and the repellent force absorbs the solution by the plate (57). The term Taylor cone means that the increase in electrical potential causes the surface of the soluble hemisphere at the end of the capillary to lengthen, resulting in such a conical shape. Its further increase overcomes the electric potential on the surface tensile forces, which causes the formation of fiber coming out of the Taylor cone (58). The fiber that comes out of the tip of the Taylor cone becomes unstable and gradually becomes thinner in the air, which is mostly due to stretching and solvent evaporation. These nanofibers are formed randomly and can eventually be assembled on a fixed collector (59) (Figure 2). Parameters such as the distance between the tip and the collector, which is made of metal, determine the solvent evaporation size of the nanofibers and the precipitation on the collector, and on the other hand, the collector movement pattern during the precipitation determines the final shape (60). Electrospinning systems are used to produce nanofibers with several different layers of different polymer systems. Another way to produce nanofibers with several different compositions is to have several holes where different solutions come out at the same time (61)
Figure 2. Schematic view of nanofiber preparation with electrospinning device
Self-assembly
Organizing in the self-assembly method is such that there are weak interactions such as electrostatic and hydrogen bonds that bind the atoms of the molecules together and create stable structures in the nanoscale (62). For the production and formation of nanostructures, the self-assembly method can be used for micelles, capsules, nanoparticles, etc. Expanding the application of nanoscale self-assembly to unconventional materials is a new way to
multi-purpose systems customized for specific applications (63). However, our goal is to make scaffold to simulate the environment inside the body so that cells can grow on it. To improve the stability and adhesion of the structure in the connecting area, there are 3 glycine amino acids at the head of the pedal flexibility groups (64) (Figure 3).
Figure 3. An example of nanofiber formation through self-assembly
 
Phase separation
The phase separation method is that the polymer solvent, which is homogeneous, is converted to polymer-rich and poor phases of polymer, and this method is accomplish by exposed to an insoluble solution or by decrease temperature of the solution under the solubility curve (65). In this method, increasing the temperature separates the phase. The polymer solution that is submerged under the freezing point is used for produce a spongy-like structure by regulation of the thermal and kinetic parameters, porous structures such as the porous nanofluid matrix are easily obtained through this technique (66). Using the phase separation method, floor scaffolding is manufactured in five stages; in the first step, the solubility of the polymer is examined, then the separation of the phase, after that the solvent is extracted by water, in the next stage, finally freeze-dry in vacuum conditions (67) (Figure 4). The gelation stage is a key step in controlling the nanofiber matrix as well as the degree of porosity. High temperature is required to produce a plate-like structure, while low temperature is required to create a network nanofiber structure (68). The limitation of the plate-like structure has been solved by increasing the cooling rate of the generators that produce uniform nanofibers. Various factors affect the properties of nanofibers, such as the concentration of the polymer (69). To reduce the porosity of the material and increase some properties such as mechanical properties, the polymer concentration must be increased. Other parameters such as thermal activities, solvent type and polymer type affect the appearance of nanofibers scaffolding (70). In the process of phase separation, a porous structure is formed within a strong, durable collagen-like fibrous network. To increase the porosity, macropores are combined by adding salt, sugar or paraffin as a porogen (Each particle volume, with a specific size and shape, is used in molded structures for tissue engineering to create pores) to the polymer solution during phase separation (71). To improve and increase cell implantation, dispersion and transfer of materials such as molecular signals, food and waste, and organizing cellular connections such as cell to cell and cell to extracellular matrix, this structure is built in the nanofibril phase separation matrix. At the cell membrane surface, there are adhesive proteins such as laminin and fibronectin that interact with nanofibers that are made similar to ECM (72). Phase separation is used to create a three-dimensional culture structure with interconnected pores. These nanofibers are characterized by a higher surface-to-volume ratio than traditional scaffolding, which improves connection, migration, proliferation, and cell differentiation (73).
 
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of formation of polymer scaffold using naphthalene
Results and discussion
The use of biopolymer nanoparticles, which have the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of natural ECM tissues in the body tissues, as well as with high porosity and surface to volume ratio, the tendency to use these biopolymers is increasing (74). Even as an electrospun nanofibrous scaffold this proves that homogenized nanofibers show a useful approach to controlling cell orientation and migration. Contact guidance theory for nanofibers used shows that a cell is most likely to migrate in a direction where the cell tends to have chemical or physical structural properties (75). The reason for the lack of two-dimensional cell culture compared to the three-dimensional that shown in the studies is that the physical and chemical properties of the environment, cellular behavior, and gene expression are significantly affected. The use of 3D culture patterns and its development is increasing (76). The challenge of using three-dimensional culture is lack of connection between the cell and scaffold and prolonging the construction time of the 3D culture (77) (Table 3).
Table 3. Advantages and disadvantages of three techniques preparation nanofiber scaffolds.
Technique Advantages Disadvantages
Phase separation Control the diameter of the structures and also their formation A limited number of short-lived polymers can be produced
Self-assembly   This method is expensive. Also, the fibers produced can be fragmented and absorbed
Electrospinning This method has advanced mechanical properties, as well as inexpensive and nanofibers produced with very small diameters in microns Scaffolding production is limited and cannot be produced in high scale
Conclusion
One of the most important nanoscale biopolymer particle design techniques for cell culture is their construction. Electrospun collagens promote the growth, migration and penetration of cells into the scaffold. Biodegradable nanofibers, which have a controlled molecular surface and structure, can be electrospun to create a three-dimensional culture medium with the special arrangement of fibers and the integrity of the structure. To control and guide cell growth, these nanofibers can provide mechanical simulation of signals, and can also use appropriate and flexible nanofibers to regulate cellular behavior and some functional biopolymers. Electrospinning is also used to design nanofibers with collagen structures for scaffolding, such as natural ECM for tissue engineering. The imitation of nanoscale natural tissue architecture has increased through the development of nanofibers. The porous structure and surface-to-volume ratio of nanofibers help adhesion, migration, proliferation, and cell proliferation. If the structure of the scaffold has a high porosity, the exchange of nutrients also the excretion of cells is better between the structure of the scaffold and the surrounding fluid. Therefore, today, research into the construction of identifying and using nanofibers can be used as 3D culture scaffolding.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by Golestan University of Medical Sciences (Gorgan, Iran) (approval code: 58112350).
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interests to declare.
Ethical approval this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR.GOUMS.REC.1400.108). The author is grateful to Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran, for providing all kinds of facilities to prepare this manuscript.
 
Type of Article: Review Article | Subject: Basic Medical Sciences
Received: 2022/01/3 | Accepted: 2022/01/23 | Published: 2022/03/30

References
1. Antman-Passig M, Shefi O. Remote Magnetic Orientation of 3D Collagen Hydrogels for Directed Neuronal Regeneration. Nano Lett. 2015 Mar 3;16. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Cao H, Liu T, Chew SY. The application of nanofibrous scaffolds in neural tissue engineering. Nanofibers Regen Med Drug Deliv. 2009 Oct 5;61(12):1055-64. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Barnes CP, Sell SA, Boland ED, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Nanofiber technology: Designing the next generation of tissue engineering scaffolds. Intersect Nanosci Mod Surf Anal Methodol. 2007 Dec 10;59(14):1413-33. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
4. Amirabadi HE, SahebAli S, Frimat J, Luttge R, Den Toonder J. A novel method to understand tumor cell invasion: integrating extracellular matrix mimicking layers in microfluidic chips by "selective curing." Biomed Microdevices. 2017;19(4):1-11. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
5. Abdollahiyan P, Oroojalian F, Mokhtarzadeh A. The triad of nanotechnology, cell signalling, and scaffold implantation for the successful repair of damaged organs: An overview on soft-tissue engineering. J Controlled Release. 2021; [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
6. Kaczmarek B, Nadolna K, Owczarek A. The physical and chemical properties of hydrogels based on natural polymers. Hydrogels Based Nat Polym. 2020;151-72. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Dowaidar M. Carbon nanofibers assist in the manufacture of prosthetic joints, promote tissue, organ, nerve regeneration and development, and improve anticancer therapy impact and chemosensitization for a range of tumor types. 2021; [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Muthukrishnan L. Imminent antimicrobial bioink deploying cellulose, alginate, EPS and synthetic polymers for 3D bioprinting of tissue constructs. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;117774. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Foster NC, Hall NM, El Haj AJ. Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Cartilage Model Platforms for Drug Evaluation and High-Throughput Screening Assays. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2021; [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Afewerki S, Sheikhi A, Kannan S, Ahadian S, Khademhosseini A. Gelatin‐polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: towards natural therapeutics. Bioeng Transl Med. 2019;4(1):96-115. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
11. Saleh F, Harb A, Soudani N, Zaraket H. A three-dimensional A549 cell culture model to study respiratory syncytial virus infections. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(8):1142-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Moohan J, Stewart SA, Espinosa E, Rosal A, Rodríguez A, Larrañeta E, et al. Cellulose nanofibers and other biopolymers for biomedical applications. A review. Appl Sci. 2020;10(1):65. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Ohkawa K, Hayashi S, Nishida A, Yamamoto H, Ducreux J. Preparation of Pure Cellulose Nanofiber via Electrospinning. Text Res J. 2009;79(15):1396-401. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Phuong V, Verstichel S, Cinelli P, Anguillesi I, Coltelli M, Lazzeri A. Cellulose Acetate Blends - Effect of Plasticizers on Properties and Biodegradability. J Renew Mater. 2014 Feb 19;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Jaeger R, Bergshoef MM, Batlle CMI, Schönherr H, Julius Vancso G. Electrospinning of ultra-thin polymer fibers. Macromol Symp. 1998 Feb 1;127(1):141-50. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Park J-Y, Kim J-I, Lee I-H. Fabrication and Characterization of Antimicrobial Ethyl Cellulose Nanofibers Using Electrospinning Techniques. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015 Aug 1;15:5672-5. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Ghorani B, Russell SJ, Goswami P. Controlled Morphology and Mechanical Characterisation of Electrospun Cellulose Acetate Fibre Webs. Lee W-F, editor. Int J Polym Sci. 2013 Apr 4;2013:256161. [DOI]
18. Lavinia Vlaia. Cellulose-Derivatives-Based Hydrogels as Vehicles for Dermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery. In: Georgeta Coneac, editor. Emerging Concepts in Analysis and Applications of Hydrogels [Internet]. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 16]. p. Ch. 7. Available from: [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Shukla S, Brinley E, Cho HJ, Seal S. Electrospinning of hydroxypropyl cellulose fibers and their application in synthesis of nano and submicron tin oxide fibers. Polymer. 2005;46(26):12130-45. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Chun M-K, Kwak B-T, Choi H-K. Preparation of buccal patch composed of carbopol, poloxamer and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Arch Pharm Res. 2003;26(11):973-8. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Das B, Chatterjee A. Salt-induced counterion condensation and related phenomena in sodium carboxymethylcellulose-sodium halide-methanol-water quaternary systems. Soft Matter. 2015;11(20):4133-40. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Chatterjee A, Das B, Das C. Polyion-counterion interaction behavior for sodium carboxymethylcellulose in methanol-water mixed solvent media. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(2):1144-52. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Pradhan S, Moore KM, Ainslie KM, Yadavalli VK. Flexible, microstructured surfaces using chitin-derived biopolymers. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(35):5328-35. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Zhong T, Liu W, Liu H. Green electrospinning of chitin propionate to manufacture nanofiber mats. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;273:118593. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
25. Mallik AK, Sakib MN, Shaharuzzaman M, Haque P, Rahman MM. Chitin nanomaterials: preparation and surface modifications. Handb Chitin Chitosan Vol 1 Prep Prop. 2020;165. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26. Qasim SB, Zafar MS, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Shah AH, Husain S, et al. Electrospinning of chitosan-based solutions for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(2):407. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
27. Chen Q, Wu J, Liu Y, Li Y, Zhang C, Qi W, et al. Electrospun chitosan/PVA/bioglass Nanofibrous membrane with spatially designed structure for accelerating chronic wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;105:110083. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Abdelghany A, Menazea A, Ismail A. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of Chitosan/Polyvinyl Alcohol blend doped with Hibiscus Sabdariffa L. extract. J Mol Struct. 2019;1197:603-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Tang S, Liu J-D, Chen W, Huang S-H, Zhang J, Bai Z-W. Performance comparison of chiral separation materials derived from N-cyclohexylcarbonyl and N-hexanoyl chitosans. J Chromatogr A. 2018;1532:112-23. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Nichifor M, Stanciu MC, Doroftei F. Self-assembly of dextran-b-deoxycholic acid polyester copolymers: Copolymer composition and self-assembly procedure tune the aggregate size and morphology. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;252:117147. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
31. Hosseinzadeh S, Zarei-Behjani Z, Bohlouli M, Khojasteh A, Ghasemi N, Salehi-Nik N. Fabrication and optimization of bioactive cylindrical scaffold prepared by electrospinning for vascular tissue engineering. Iran Polym J. 2021;1-15. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Lyakhovich Y. Silk as a Biomaterial for Tissue-Engineered Vascular Conduits. McGill University (Canada); 2019. [Google Scholar]
33. Chen W, Zhou S, Ge L, Wu W, Jiang X. Translatable high drug loading drug delivery systems based on biocompatible polymer nanocarriers. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19(6):1732-45. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
34. Abou-Okeil A, Fahmy H, Fouda MM, Aly A, Ibrahim H. Hyaluronic Acid/Oxidized К-Carrageenan Electrospun Nanofibers Synthesis and Antibacterial Properties. BioNanoScience. 2021;11(3):687-95. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
35. Tan Z, Jiang Y, Zhang W, Karls L, Lodge TP, Reineke TM. Polycation architecture and assembly direct successful gene delivery: Micelleplexes outperform polyplexes via optimal DNA packaging. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(40):15804-17. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
36. Gu X, Li N, Luo J, Xia X, Gu H, Xiong J. Electrospun polyurethane microporous membranes for waterproof and breathable application: the effects of solvent properties on membrane performance. Polym Bull. 2018;75(8):3539-53. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
37. Subramani NK, Shivanna S, Nagaraj SK, Suresha B, Raj BJ, Siddaramaiah H. Optoelectronic Behaviours of UV shielding Calcium ZirconateReinforced Polycarbonate Nanocomposite Films: An Optical View. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(8):16626-32. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
38. Pramanik C, Jamil T, Gissinger JR, Guittet D, Arias‐Monje PJ, Kumar S, et al. Polyacrylonitrile interactions with carbon nanotubes in solution: Conformations and binding as a function of solvent, temperature, and concentration. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(50):1905247. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
39. Resendiz-Lara DA, Stubbs NE, Arz MI, Pridmore NE, Sparkes HA, Manners I. Boron-nitrogen main chain analogues of polystyrene: poly (B-aryl) aminoboranes via catalytic dehydrocoupling. Chem Commun. 2017;53(85):11701-4. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
40. Alarfaj NA, Amina M, Al Musayeib NM, El-Tohamy MF, Oraby HF, Bukhari SI, et al. Prospective of Green Synthesized Oleum cumini Oil/PVP/MgO Bionanocomposite Film for Its Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Anticancer Applications. J Polym Environ. 2020;28(8). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
41. Hongthipwaree T, Sriamornsak P, Seadan M, Suttiruengwong S. Effect of cosolvent on properties of non-woven porous neomycin-loaded poly (lactic acid)/polycaprolactone fibers. Mater Today Sustain. 2020;10:100051. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
42. Tavares TB, de Sousa FF, Sales MJ, Paterno LG, Paschoal W, Moreira SG. Optical and morphological features of poly (vinyl carbazole)/ferrite composites for potential opto-electronic applications. Appl Phys A. 2021;127(11):1-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Zhu C, Zhu J, Wang C, Chen R, Sun L, Ru C. Wrinkle-free, sandwich, electrospun PLGA/SF nanofibrous scaffold for skin tissue engineering. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol. 2018;17(4):675-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44. Maghdouri-White Y, Bowlin GL, Lemmon CA, Dréau D. Bioengineered silk scaffolds in 3D tissue modeling with focus on mammary tissues. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:1168-80. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
45. Wolf K, Alexander S, Schacht V, Coussens LM, von Andrian UH, van Rheenen J, et al. Collagen-based cell migration models in vitro and in vivo. In Elsevier; 2009. p. 931-41. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
46. Yang Z, Xu H, Zhao X. Designer self‐assembling peptide hydrogels to engineer 3D cell microenvironments for cell constructs formation and precise oncology remodeling in ovarian cancer. Adv Sci. 2020;7(9):1903718. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
47. Bello AB, Kim D, Kim D, Park H, Lee S-H. Engineering and functionalization of gelatin biomaterials: From cell culture to medical applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020;26(2):164-80. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
48. Cheng L, Yao B, Hu T, Cui X, Shu X, Tang S, et al. Properties of an alginate-gelatin-based bioink and its potential impact on cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;135:1107-13. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
49. Abbasi H, Fahim H, Mahboubi M. Fabrication and characterization of composite film based on gelatin and electrospun cellulose acetate fibers incorporating essential oil. J Food Me :as char: act. 2021;15(2):2108-18. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
50. Li H, Tan YJ, Li L. A strategy for strong interface bonding by 3D bioprinting of oppositely charged κ-carrageenan and gelatin hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;198:261-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
51. Li D, Zhang K, Shi C, Liu L, Yan G, Liu C, et al. Small molecules modified biomimetic gelatin/hydroxyapatite nanofibers constructing an ideal osteogenic microenvironment with significantly enhanced cranial bone formation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:7167. [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
52. Mowbray S. Investigation of Organ Level Muscle Properties and Mechanics Through Modeling Fiber Architecture of Soft Tissue Muscle Groups and the Effect of Necrotic Tissue on Muscle Fiber Orientation. 2021; [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
53. Padaki M, Subrahmanya T, Prasad D, Jadhav AH. Electrospun Nanofibers: Role of Nanofibers in Water Remediation and Effect of Experimental Variables on their Nano topography and Application Processes. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2021; [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
54. Teixeira MA, Amorim MTP, Felgueiras HP. Poly (vinyl alcohol)-based nanofibrous electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Polymers. 2020;12(1):7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
55. Zhang Q, Wang X, Fu J, Liu R, He H, Ma J, et al. Electrospinning of ultrafine conducting polymer composite nanofibers with diameter less than 70 nm as high sensitive gas sensor. Materials. 2018;11(9):1744. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
56. Ghaderpour A, Hoseinkhani Z, Yarani R, Mohammadiani S, Amiri F, Mansouri K. Altering the characterization of nanofibers by changing the electrospinning parameters and their application in tissue engineering, drug delivery, and gene delivery systems. Polym Adv Technol. 2021;32(5):1924-50. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
57. Bhattarai RS, Bachu RD, Boddu SH, Bhaduri S. Biomedical applications of electrospun nanofibers: Drug and nanoparticle delivery. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(1):5. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
58. Hai T, Wan X, Yu D-G, Wang K, Yang Y, Liu Z-P. Electrospun lipid-coated medicated nanocomposites for an improved drug sustained-release profile. Mater Des. 2019;162:70-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
59. He Z, Rault F, Lewandowski M, Mohsenzadeh E, Salaün F. Electrospun PVDF nanofibers for piezoelectric applications: A review of the influence of electrospinning parameters on the β phase and crystallinity enhancement. Polymers. 2021;13(2):174. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
60. Barhoum A, Pal K, Rahier H, Uludag H, Kim IS, Bechelany M. Nanofibers as new-generation materials: from spinning and nano-spinning fabrication techniques to emerging applications. Appl Mater Today. 2019;17:1-35. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
61. Rahmati M, Mills DK, Urbanska AM, Saeb MR, Venugopal JR, Ramakrishna S, Mozafari M. Electrospinning for tissue engineering applications. Progress in Materials Science. 2021 Apr 1;117:100721. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
62. Ariga K, Jia X, Song J, Hill JP, Leong DT, Jia Y, et al. Nanoarchitectonics beyond self‐assembly: challenges to create bio‐like hierarchic organization. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(36):15424-46. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
63. Fan L, Wang X, Wu D. Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes (POSS)‐based Hybrid Materials: Molecular Design, Solution Self‐Assembly and Biomedical Applications. Chin J Chem. 2021;39(3):757-74. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
64. De Groot SC, Sliedregt K, Van Benthem PPG, Rivolta MN, Huisman MA. Building an Artificial Stem Cell Niche: Prerequisites for Future 3D‐Formation of Inner Ear Structures-Toward 3D Inner Ear Biotechnology. Anat Rec. 2020;303(3):408-26. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
65. Bueno A, Luebbert C, Enders S, Sadowski G, Smirnova I. Production of polylactic acid aerogels via phase separation and supercritical CO2 drying: thermodynamic analysis of the gelation and drying process. J Mater Sci. 2021;1-20. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
66. Salgado M, Santos F, Rodríguez-Rojo S, Reis RL, Duarte ARC, Cocero MJ. Development of barley and yeast β-glucan aerogels for drug delivery by supercritical fluids. J CO2 Util. 2017;22:262-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
67. Grenier J, Duval H, Barou F, Lv P, David B, Letourneur D. Mechanisms of pore formation in hydrogel scaffolds textured by freeze-drying. Acta Biomater. 2019;94:195-203. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
68. Chu B, He J, Wang Z, Liu L, Li X, Wu C-X, et al. Proangiogenic peptide nanofiber hydrogel/3D printed scaffold for dermal regeneration. Chem Eng J. 2021;424:128146. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
69. Nandihalli N, Liu C-J, Mori T. Polymer based thermoelectric nanocomposite materials and devices: Fabrication and characteristics. Nano Energy. 2020;105186. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
70. Liu Y, Xie J, Wu N, Wang L, Ma Y, Tong J. Influence of silane treatment on the mechanical, tribological and morphological properties of corn stalk fiber reinforced polymer composites. Tribol Int. 2019;131:398-405. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
71. Mbundi L, Gonzalez-Perez M, Gonzalez-Perez F, Juanes-Gusano D, Rodriguez-Cabello JC. Trends in the Development of Tailored Elastin-Like Recombinamer-Based Porous Biomaterials for Soft and Hard Tissue Applications. Front Mater 7 601795 Doi 103389fmats. 2021; [DOI] [Google Scholar]
72. Croce S, Peloso A, Zoro T, Avanzini MA, Cobianchi L. A hepatic scaffold from decellularized liver tissue: food for thought. Biomolecules. 2019;9(12):813. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
73. Hokmabad VR, Davaran S, Aghazadeh M, Rahbarghazi R, Salehi R, Ramazani A. Fabrication and characterization of novel ethyl cellulose-grafted-poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/alginate nanofibrous/macroporous scaffolds incorporated with nano-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl. 2019;33(8):1128-44. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
74. Huang L, Huang J, Shao H, Hu X, Cao C, Fan S, et al. Silk scaffolds with gradient pore structure and improved cell infiltration performance. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;94:179-89. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
75. Chen C-H, Li D-L, Chuang AD-C, Dash BS, Chen J-P. Tension Stimulation of Tenocytes in Aligned Hyaluronic Acid/Platelet-Rich Plasma-Polycaprolactone Core-Sheath Nanofiber Membrane Scaffold for Tendon Tissue Engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(20):11215. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [PMCID] [Google Scholar]
76. Sensi F, D’Angelo E, D’Aronco S, Molinaro R, Agostini M. Preclinical three‐dimensional colorectal cancer model: The next generation of in vitro drug efficacy evaluation. Journal of cellular physiology. 2019 Jan;234(1):181-91. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
77. Foglietta F, Canaparo R, Muccioli G, Terreno E, Serpe L. Methodological aspects and pharmacological applications of three-dimensional cancer cell cultures and organoids. Life Sci. 2020;254:117784. [view at publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Jorjani Biomedicine Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb