Volume 8, Issue 3 (10-2020)                   Jorjani Biomed J 2020, 8(3): 19-26 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Taziki M H. Evaluation of the Cases with Peritonsillar Space Infection and the Influential Factors in 5th Azar Hospital of Gorgan, Iran (2010-2017). Jorjani Biomed J 2020; 8 (3) :19-26
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-683-en.html
ENT Specialist General Surgery (ENT), medical college, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran , hoseinta@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 396 kb]   (1721 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (5326 Views)
Full-Text:   (1080 Views)
Introduction
Palatine tonsils are bundles of the lymphatic tissue, which are located in the tonsillar pillars of the oropharynx (1). The peritonsillar space is a potential space between the tonsils and upper sphincter. Peritonsillar abscess (PTA) occurs in case of the accumulation of pus due to infection. Infection in this space may spread to other spaces and cause irreparable risks. In some cases, the infection could appear in the form of cellulite (peritonsillar cellulitis [PTC]), which eventually develops into PTA. In the United States, the incidence of PTA has been reported to be 30 cases per 100,000 each year and approximately 45,000 total cases per year (2). Notably, approximately 25-30% of the patients with PTA are in the pediatric population (3). The age of the patients with PTA has been reported to be 1-76 years, with the highest incidence rate observed within the age range of 15-35 years (1). While the exact etiology of PTA remains unclear (4), some of the possible causes include acute tonsillitis, dental infections, and obstruction of the Weber's glands (4-6). In addition, smoking habits and season of the year have been reported to be the other possible causes of PTA (5, 7-10). The microbial agents causing PTA are similar to those that cause acute and chronic tonsillitis, and several aerobic and anaerobic microbes are involved in this condition (11-14). In general, the symptoms of PTA include fever, sore throat, faint, lethargy, dysphagia, odynophagia, and ataxia. In addition to trismus and tonsillitis, swelling around the tonsils has also been observed in the patient examinations, and fluctuations may also be detected in physical examination (5, 15-17).
The clinical examination of PTA is preceded by reviewing the medical history of the patient for the initial diagnosis, followed by the final confirmation by fine needle aspiration. While the process is recognized as diagnostic and treatment method in this regard, it may cause complications such as carotid arterial damage even if it is performed by experienced professionals. On the other hand, ultrasound-guided aspiration could decrease the risks of the procedure (18-20). The first-line treatments for PTA include antibiotic therapy, hydration, analgesic therapy, and surgical treatment. If there is doubt about whether the patient has PTA or PTC, antibiotics are prescribed first, and surgery is performed in case of treatment irresponsiveness. The surgical treatments of the condition involve fine needle aspiration-incision, drainage, and simultaneous tonsillectomy with drainage. If left untreated, the disease may spread to other deep cervical regions and cause severe complications.
Given the importance of the disease and its possible causes, the present study aimed to evaluate the cases of peritonsillar space infection and some of the influential factors in 5th Azar Hospital of Gorgan, Iran during 2010-2017.
Materials and Methods
This cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical study was performed based on the medical files of patients with the initial diagnosis of peritonsillar space infection referring to 5th Azar Hospital of Gorgan, Iran during 2010-2017. The data of the patients were extracted by referring to the statistics and medical records unit of the hospital. The initial diagnosis had been made by an otolaryngologist and recorded in the medical files of the patients. The patients undergoing physical examination whose medical history had been obtained and required fine needle aspiration were considered as PTA patients, and those with undecided abscess were considered as PTC patients.
Demographic characteristics included age, gender, initial diagnosis, final diagnosis, type of treatment, disease recurrence, season of the year, and smoking habits/opium consumption. Incomplete medical files were completed via phone call, and those requiring an examination were called to the hospital after explaining that they would be enrolled in a research project. The patients who were unwilling to participate in the research or did not fully respond to the questions were not selected.
To comply with ethical considerations, the study protocol was approved by Golestan University of Medical Sciences (ethics code: IR.GOUMS.REC.1396.207). In addition, the participants were assured of the confidentiality terms regarding their personal information.
Data analysis was performed in SPSS version 16 using mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage to describe the data, independent t-test to compare the mean of the two groups in case of the establishment of the statistical presuppositions, paired t-test for the pretest and posttest comparison, Wilcoxon test in case of the lack of establishment, and Chi-square to compare the qualitative variables.
Result
In total, 93 patients were enrolled in the study with the mean age of 32.31±14.59 years and minimum and maximum age of six months and 73 years, respectively. According to the information in Table 1, the highest and lowest frequency of the disease was observed in the patients aged 20-30 years (33.31%) and 10-20 years (5.4%), respectively.



Table 1. Frequency of Patients with Peritonsillar Space Infection in Different Age Groups
% N Age (year)
10.8 10 0-10
5.4 5 10-20
33.3 31 20-30
24.7 23 30-40
25.8 24 40 <
100.0 93 Total









In terms of gender, 58.1% of the patients were male, and the others (41.9%) were female. Regarding the disease diagnosis, 76 cases (81.7%) had PTA, and 17 cases (18.3%) had PTC (Table 2).
 
Table 2. Frequency of Abscess and Cellulitis Based on Age Group
Age Group (year)
P-value 40< 30-40 20-30 10-20 0-10 Diagnosis
 
0.182
17 (22.4%) 20 (26.3%) 26 (34.2%) 3 (3.9%) 10 (13.2%) Abscess
7 (41.2%) 3 (17.6%) 5 (29.4%) 2 (11.8%) 0 (0%) Cellulitis
  24 (25.8%) 23 (24.7%) 31 (33.3%) 5 (5.4%) 10 (10.8%) Total
 
In terms of the affected site, 45 patients (48.4%) had involvement on the right side, while 43 (46.2%) and five cases (5.4%) had involvement on the left side and both sides, respectively. Out of 93 patients, data on the smoking habits and opium use were collected from only 53 patients. In this regard, five cases (5.4%) had a positive smoking status, and five cases (5.4%) used opium. Table 3 shows the type of treatment in the patients. Correspondingly, the patients with cellulitis received antibiotic treatment. On the other hand, 13 cases with abscess (71.1%) received antibiotic therapy, while three (3.9%), 12 (15.8%), and 48 cases (63.2%) received aspiration with antibiotic therapy, tonsillectomy with antibiotic therapy, and drainage with antibiotic therapy, respectively.

Table 3. Treatments of Patients with Abscess and Cellulitis
Treatment
Drainage and Antibiotic Therapy
N (%)
Tonsillectomy and Antibiotic Therapy
N (%)
Aspiration and Antibiotic Therapy
N (%)
Antibiotic Therapy
N (%)
Diagnosis
48 (63.2%) 12 (15.8%) 3 (3.9%) 13 (17.1%) Abscess
0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0 %) 17 (100.0 %) Cellulitis
48 (51.6%) 12 (12.9%) 3 (3.2%) 30 (32.3%) Total







 

In terms of the season of the year, 37.6% of the patients were diagnosed in spring, while 16.8%, 21.5%, and 24.7% of the subjects were diagnosed in summer, fall, and winter, respectively. The frequency of abscess and cellulitis was examined based on age, gender, season, infection, smoking habits, and opium use, and the only significant correlations were observed between the type of diagnosis, smoking habits, and opium consumption (P=0.014) (Table 4).
Table 4. Comparison of Frequency of Abscess and Cellulitis Based on Variable of Smoking Habits and Opium Use
Opium Use/Smoking Habits
P-value
(Chi-square)
No
N (%)
Yes
N (%)
Diagnosis
 
0.014
41 (95.3%) 2 (4.7%) Abscess
7 (70.0%) 3 (30.0%) Cellulitis
  48 (90.6) 5 (9.4) Total

Among the patients, recurrence was observed in only five cases (5.4%), three of which were male, and the others were female. In all the cases, recurrence occurred at least one month after the treatment and initial hospitalization. Regarding age, one patient was in the age group of 0-10 years, one case was in the range of 20-30 years, one patient was in the age group of 30-40 years, and two cases were aged more than 40 years. Among the patients experiencing recurrence, four cases underwent surgery, and one case received non-surgical treatment.
Discussion
In total, 93 patients with peritonsillar space infection were evaluated in the present study, with the mean age of 32.31±14.59 years and the minimum and maximum age of six months and 73 years, respectively; the majority of the patients (33.31%) were aged 20-30 years. In a research conducted by Gosselin et al., the patients were aged 1-76 years (1), while Taziki et al. reported the highest frequency of the patients to be within the age range of 20-29 years (21). On the other hand, the majority of the patients in the studies by Penning (22), Matsuda et al. (23), and Kristen et al. (24) were in their second and third decades of life and age ranges of 20-29 and 20-30 years, respectively. The comparison of our findings with the results of the aforementioned studies demonstrated that while the disease could occur in a wide age range, most of the patients are aged 20-30 years. In this regard, previous studies have yielded similar results. In the present study, 58.1% of the patients with peritonsillar space infection were male, and the others (41.9%) were female. In the research by Taziki et al., 28.9% of the participants with the disease were female, and 71.1% were male (21). Moreover, Afolobj et al. reported the higher prevalence of peritonsillar space infection among men compared to women (25). The comparison of the studies in this regard has also confirmed the higher prevalence of the disease in men compared to women.
In the current research, the disease was more prevalent in spring and summer, while Seyun-N et al. have reported the higher prevalence rate of the disease in winter and spring (26). In the present study, significant correlations were observed between opium use, smoking habits, and the occurrence of peritonsillar space infection (P=0.014). Similar findings have been proposed by Schwrzd et al. (27), while Sunmark et al. failed to confirm the correlation despite expressing its possibility (28). In the current research, only five (5.4%) out of 93 patients experienced disease recurrence, three of whom were male, and two were female. In this regard, Taziki et al. reported the recurrence rate of peritonsillar space infection to be 17.7% (21). In the studies by Wolf et al. (29), Herzon (30), and Ong et al. (7), the recurrence rate was estimated at 14.3%, 10-15%, and 9.2%, respectively (7). The comparison of the results of the present study with the previous findings demonstrated the lower recurrence rate in our research, which might be due to the different patterns of antibiotic resistance and treatment methods. In the current research, five patients (5.4%) experienced disease recurrence, three of whom were male, and two were female. In the research by Taziki et al., the recurrence rate of the disease was observed to be higher in the female patients compared to the male patients (21).
In the present study, one of the patients experiencing recurrence (20%) was aged 0-10 years, one patient (20%) was aged 20-30 years, one patient (20%) was aged 20-40 years, and two cases (41%) were aged more than 40 years. In the study by Taziki et al., the highest recurrence rate was observed within the age range of 20-29 years, and the lowest rate was reported in the patients aged more than 30 years (21). In the research conducted by Kristen, the highest recurrence rate (90%) was observed in the age range of 20-30 years, while none of the cases was aged more than 40 years (24). In this regard, our findings are inconsistent with the aforementioned studies as the recurrence rate was higher in the patients aged more than 40 years in the present study.
In the current research, the majority of the patients underwent drainage and antibiotic therapy, and in one case, the patient improved with antibiotic treatment. Several studies have been focused on the effect of the type of treatment on the recurrence rate, and various reports have been published in this respect. In the research by Taziki et al., the maximum recurrence rate was observed in the cases receiving non-surgical medical treatment (21), while Wolff et al. reported that recurrence rate was higher in surgical incisions and drainage (29). On the other hand, Johnson et al. reported the rate of recurrence to be the same in various treatments (31). The comparison of the results of several studies indicated that none of the mentioned treatments could prevent the recurrence of abscess, and tonsillectomy should be performed in proper conditions. Although a patient may not refer for delayed tonsillectomy, the bleeding line increases if the procedure is performed simultaneous with abscess drainage (32).
In the present study, no complications occurred due to the spread of the infection to the other cervical regions or mediastinum; similarly, no complications were reported by Taziki et al. (21). However, Matsuda et al. reported complications in 1.8% of the cases (23), which could be due to early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, preventing the spread of the infection to other areas.
Conclusion
Considering that the relatively high prevalence of peritonsillar space infection leads to hospitalization and possible complications, and with regard to the need for tonsillectomy surgery despite the performed treatments, it is recommended that the necessary training be provided to the patients for timely follow-up and surgery since they may not refer for surgery after discharge.
Acknowledgments
This article was extracted from a PhD dissertation conducted at Gorgan Medical School (registration code: 811; ethics code: IR.GOUMS.REC.1396.207) with the permit of the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology of Golestan University of Medical Sciences. Hereby, we extend our gratitude to those who assisted us in performing the research. We would also like to thank Ms. Sepideh Sadat Hosseini, the surgery department specialist of 5th Azar Hospital.

How to cite:
Taziki M.H. Evaluation of the Cases with Peritonsillar Space Infection and the Influential Factors in 5th Azar Hospital of Gorgan, Iran (2010-2017). Jorjani Biomedicine Journal. 2020; 8(3): 19-26.
 
 
 
 
Type of Article: Original article | Subject: General medicine
Received: 2020/02/28 | Accepted: 2020/08/5 | Published: 2020/10/1

References
1. Gosseling BJ, Daley BJ, Talavera F, Friedman AL, Zamboni P, Geibel J, Peritonsillar abscess. http://emedicine.com/med/topic2803.htm. Last updated: October 25, 2004. [Google Scholar]
2. Kazzi AA, Glick M, Talavera F, Fourre MW, Halamka J, Mallon WK. peritonsillar Abscess. http://emedicine.com/emerg/topic417.thm. Last updated: August 7, 2004.
3. Segal G, Kumar A, Konop R, Bomachowske J, Tolan RW, Steele R. Peritonsillar Abscess. http://emedicine.com/ped/topi2684.thm. Last updated: July 27, 2004.
4. Powell EL, Powell J, Samuel JP, Wilson JA (2013) A review of the pathogenesis of adult peritonsillar abscess: time for a re-evaluation. J Antimicrob Chemother 68(9):1941-1950. [view at publisher] [DOI:10.1093/jac/dkt128] [Google Scholar]
5. Buckley J1, Harris AS2, Addams-Williams J3, Ten years of deep neck space abscesses, J Laryngol Otal. 2019 Apr;133(4):324-328. Doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000458.Epub 2019 Mar 29. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Galioto NJ (2008) Peritonsillar abscess. Am Fam Physician 77(2):199-202. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
7. Passy V (1994) Pathogenesis of Peritonsillar abscess. Laryngoscope 104(2):185-190. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Ong YK, Goh YH, Lee YL (2004) Peritonsillar infections: local experience. Singapore Med J 45(3):105-109. [Google Scholar]
9. MaromT, Rusan M, Clemmensen KK, Fuursted K, Ovesen T (2013) Smoking promotes peritonsillar abscess. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270(12):3163-3167. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Segal N, El-saied S, Puterman M (2009) peritonsillar abscess in children in the southern district of Israel. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 73(8):1148-1150. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
11. Gavriel H, Lazarovitch T, Pomortsev A, Eviatar E (2009) Variations in the microbiology of peritonsillar abscess. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28(1):27-31. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
12. Hidaka H, Kuriyama S, Yano H, Tsuji I, Kobayashi T (2011) Precipitating factors in the pathogenesis of peritonsillar abscess and bacteriological significance of the Streptococcus milleri group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 30(4):527-532. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
13. Galioto NJ. Peritonsillar abscess. Am Fam Physician 2008;77:199-202. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
14. Hagiwara Y1, Saito Y2, Ogura H3, Yaguchi Y4, Shimizu T5, Hasegawa Y6, Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration of Peritonsillar Abscesses : Utility of Transoral Pharyngeal Ultrasonography, Diagnostic (Basel). 2019 Oct 5;9(4). Pii: E141. Doi: 10.3390/diagnostics9040141. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Taziki MH, Behnampour N, Seadin S. The incidence of peritonsillar abscess recurrence and their relation with the type of treatment . J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2004; 6 (2) :40-44. [Google Scholar]
16. Knipping S, Passmann M, Schrom T, Berghaus A. Abscess tonsillectomy for acute peritonsillar abscess. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2002;123(1):13-6. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
17. Matsuda A, Tanaka H, Kanaya T, Kamata K, Hasegawa M. Peritonsillar abscess: a study of 724 cases in Japan. Ear Nose Throat J. 2002;81(6)384-9. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Franzese CB, Isaacson JE, Peritonsillar and parapharyngeal space abscess in the older adult. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003;24(3):169-73. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
19. Afolabi OA1, Abdullahi A2, Labaran AS2, Ladan S2, Sanni R2, Muasa E2, Ahmad BM2, Peritonsillar abscess in northern Nigeria: a 7 years review, Malays J Med Sci. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):14-8. [view at publisher] [Google Scholar]
20. Seyhun N1, Calis ZAB1, Ekici M1, Turgut S1, Epidemiology and Clinical Features of peritonsillar Abscess: Is It Related to Seasonal Variations?, Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Dec;56(4):221-225. Doi: 10.5152/tao.2018.3362. Epub 2018 Dec 1. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
21. Schwarz D1, Wolber P1, Balk M1, Luers JC1. Analysis of smoking behavior in patients with peritonsillar abscess: a prospective , matched case-control study, J Laryngol Otal. 2018 Oct;132(10):827-874. Doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001585. Epub 2018 Sep 13. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Sanmark E1, Wiksten J1, Walimaa H2,3, Blomgren K1, Smooking or poor oral hygiene do not predispose to peritonsillar abscesses via changes in oral flora, Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Sep;139(9):798-802. Doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1631479. Epub 2019 Jun 26. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Wolf M, Even-Chen I, Kronenberg J, Peritonsillar abscess: repeated needle aspiration versus incision and drainage. Ann Otal Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103(7):554-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24. Herzon FS. Harris P. Mosher Award thesis. Peritonsillar abscess: incidence, current management practices, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(8 Pt 3 Suppl 74):1-17. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Ong YK, Goh YH, Lee YL. Peritonsillar infections: local experience. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(3):105-9. [Google Scholar]
26. Johnson RF, Stewart MG, Wrigth CC. An evidence-based review of the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.2003;128(3):332-43. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Nami Saber C1, Klug TE1, Post-operative haemorrhage after acute bilateral tonsillectomy in patients with peritonsillar abscess: prevalence, treatment, risk factors, and side of bleeding, Acta Otolaryngol. 2020 Jan;140(1):66-71. Doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1682189. Epub 2019 Oct 31. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Sanmark E, Wiksten J, Välimaa H, Blomgren K. Smoking or poor oral hygiene do not predispose to peritonsillar abscesses via changes in oral flora. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2019;139(9):798-802. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Wolf M, Even-Chen I, Kronenberg J. Peritonsillar abscess: repeated needle aspiration versus incision and drainage. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 1994;103(7):554-7. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
30. Herzon FS. Peritonsillar abscess: incidence, current management practices, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. The Laryngoscope. 1995;105(S3):1-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31. Johnson RF, Stewart MG, Wright CC. An evidence-based review of the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2003;128(3):332-43. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Nami Saber C, Klug TE. Post-operative haemorrhage after acute bilateral tonsillectomy in patients with peritonsillar abscess: prevalence, treatment, risk factors, and side of bleeding. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2020;140(1):66-71. [view at publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Jorjani Biomedicine Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb