Volume 7, Issue 2 (7-2019)                   Jorjani Biomed J 2019, 7(2): 49-60 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Behnampour A, Biglarian A, Bakhshi E. Application of fuzzy logistic regression in modeling the severity of autism spectrum disorder. Jorjani Biomed J 2019; 7 (2) :49-60
URL: http://goums.ac.ir/jorjanijournal/article-1-657-en.html
1- University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences
2- University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences , abiglarian@uswr.ac.ir
Full-Text [PDF 604 kb]   (2126 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (6473 Views)
Full-Text:   (1164 Views)
Introduction
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is one of the neurodevelopmental disorders which characterized by severe deficits and pervasive impairment in multiple areas of development including impairment in reciprocal social interaction, impaired communication, and the presence of stereotyped behaviors, interests, and activities (1). This disorder is recognized as the most serious and at the same time the most unknown childhood disorder (2, 3). For the first time in 1943, the Austrian psychiatrist, Leo Conner, described and introduced children who, from the first year of their lives, constantly avoided any contacts and in their behavior, there were signs of features such as autism, repetition or verbal echoes, consistency, and lack of eye contact (4-6).
Autism spectrum disorder (autism) includes, Autistic disorder (Some people with autism spectrum disorder with common IQ are known as patients with high functioning autism HFA), Asperger's syndrome (there is controversy about the validity of the distinction between Asperger's syndrome and high functioning autism), Rett syndrome, Childhood disintegrative disorder and Pervasive developmental disorders not otherwise specified PDD-NOS (also known as abnormal autism) (7). The common feature of these five disorders is their occurrence in early childhood and the violation of social relations and functioning which recognized as the most important feature of all these disorders (8).
Studies illustrates an increasing prevalence of this disorder. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) prevalence of this disorder reported one out of 150, one person in 110, one per 88 people and one in 68 in 2002, 2006, 2008 and 2014, respectively (9-11). Prevalence studies in Iran also indicate growth in the number of children dealing with autism. Bozorgnia, Malekpour, and Abedi reported the prevalence of this disorder 12.15 and 9.97 per 10,000 children in Isfahan and Shahre-kord, respectively (12). Samadi et al. reported the prevalence of autism in Iran, 6.26 per 10,000 children in 2007 (13) and 95.2 per 10,000 children in 2014 (14). It is also worth noting that men are more likely to suffer this disorder, 6 against 1, compared to women (15). Given the many problems that this disorder can cause for the child, family and society and its increasing prevalence, the necessity of early screening and diagnosis and timely interventions are of particular importance (16). One of the major problems of children enduring autism spectrum disorder is their defection in social communication. Failure in normal social communication can have a negative impact on other aspects of growth, including joint attention. The close relationship between impairment in joint attention and deficits in other skills underlines the importance of this ability. Joint attention skills predict other skills such as language skills and social behaviors, social-emotional comprehension, symbolic games, the theory of mind, and social cognition in children with autism (17).
Since 1980 which autism disorder was first recognized as a separate category, until 2013 when the fifth edition of the DSM-5 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) was published by the American Psychiatric Association, vast changes have occurred in the field of autism. The main criticism of the earlier version of the DSM was that it lacked a discriminatory classification of transparency. Some studies demonstrate that in many disorders the distinction between major and mild symptoms is related to "level", not "type" (18). Because of that and also due to problems in distinguishing autism disorder, Asperger's disorder, Rett's syndrome, and Childhood disintegrative disorder, the DSM-5 eliminated all these disorders and classified them under the so-called "autism spectrum disorder (autism)" (1). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition has introduced three levels of severity for autism: Level 1: Requiring support; Level 2: Requiring substantial support; Level 3: Requiring very substantial support.
Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder is a complex process that requires a standard set of information through the observation of the child and interviewing parents as well as other information about the child's performance. Standardized and validated tools can greatly help professionals in the process. Early detection of autism spectrum disorders is an important issue in autism research. The importance of this issue has enhanced, especially after the publication of studies showing that early intervention and treatment of autism spectrum disorders are associated with superior outcomes. In other words, early detection of autism spectrum disorders increases the possibility of receiving relevant and focused intervention services based on the specific educational and clinical needs of the child (19). Researchers' attention to treatment has led them to look for precise tools to diagnose autism disorder. For this purpose, several diagnostic tools have been developed, including the GARS as one of the most important ones. This test was developed as a valid test by Gilliam in 1994 and its reliability in the range of acceptability has been accepted (20).
"Indeed, the complexity of biological systems may force us to alter in radical ways our traditional approaches to the analysis of such systems. Thus, we may have to accept as unavoidable a substantial degree of fuzziness in the description of the behavior of biological systems as well as in their characterization. ” Zadeh said in 1969 (21). He further stated the main use of linguistic variables and fuzzy algorithms in fields such as economics, management, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, medicine and biology (22).
To model the relationships between variables whose observations are ambiguous, conventional statistical models based on accurate observations and some distributional assumptions cannot be used. Therefore, fuzzy sets can be used to model, describe, and analyze the relationships between such variables. Therefore, fuzzy set theory can be used as an alternative to modeling, describing, and analyzing the relationships between such variables. Since the introduction of fuzzy set theory, its application has been expanding in vast fields of statistics, many of which are conceivable in applied medical research, including: Fuzzy clustering, fuzzy discriminant analysis (23), fuzzy regression (24, 25), fuzzy approach disease detection (26), and modeling the appearance and transmission of latent diseases (27).
Virtually most studies on fuzzy regression have been performed on linear models, and nonlinear models have rarely been investigated in the fuzzy field. Logistic regression model is known as one of the most famous nonlinear models which widely used in medical sciences and social studies. In this model, the values of the response variable can be discrete or qualitative, and accurate observations must be used to fit the model. Non-precise or vague observations occurred frequently in practical situations, especially in medical studies such as cases measured by linguistic terms rather than numbers, and thus the assumptions of the logistic regression model are violated or cannot be investigated. When data set includes ambiguous data which cannot be expressed by exact real number, fuzzy logistic regression could be an alternative choice (28). The purpose of this study is to fit a model to determine the severity of autism disorder using fuzzy logistic regression.
Material and methods
In this cross-sectional study, 22 children with ASD which referred to the rehabilitation centers of Gorgan in 2017 were used as research samples, who were selected in the census. Their parents or therapists were asked to intently complete the Persian version of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS) for these children. Gender, age (year) and raw score for each of the stereotypical movements, communication and social interaction subscales were considered as the crisp input variables. Also, another therapist's opinion, who evaluated individuals, was recorded as the severity of the disorder as a fuzzy response variable. The therapist was asked to assign a severity of the disorder to each case using linguistic terms (low, moderate, high). After evaluation, 3 children were excluded due to lack of communication subscale score (because of speech inability), and one child as a result of missed social interaction subscale score, therefore the number of subjects declined to 18 individuals. The questioner used in this study was the Persian version of the Gilliam Autism Rating Scale (GARS), which Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.90 for stereotypical movements, 0.89 for communication, and 0.93 for social interaction is reported (29).
In the present study, the fuzzy logistic regression with crisp input and fuzzy output was employed to analyze the data. In order to evaluate the goodness of fit of the model, Measure of performance based on fuzzy distance (MP) is used. In the following, details of fuzzy logistic regression are explained for further elucidation.
Fuzzy Logistic Regression:
Let  = Poss ( = 1), i = 1,…, m, be the possibility of characteristic 1 or success, for the ith case. The possibility of success for the preferred characteristic is defined by a linguistic term, μi ∈ (low, moderate, high). Appropriate fuzzy numbers can be defined by an expert for each term of the linguistic variable. These terms should be defined in such a way that the :union: of their supports cover the whole range of (0, 1). Then the ratio  is considered as possibilistic odds of the ith case, which detects the possibility of success relative to the possibility of non success.
For modeling the possibilistic odds based on a set of crisp explanatory variables, the observations for the ith case are considered as. The fuzzy logistic regression model is, therefore, as follows:
where  is a triangular fuzzy number.
For example triangular fuzzy numbers that are defined for the possibility of success m= (Low, Moderate, High) are given in (2) and are shown in Fig. 1.

The fuzzy regression model in which input data are non-fuzzy and output data are fuzzy, is expressed as the following equation:
The regression coefficients are not necessarily symmetric triangular fuzzy numbers.  is the left endpoint,  is the right endpoint, and  is the mode of  (30).
When the expert assigns a linguistic term like m = (Low, Moderate, High) as the possibility of success for the preferred characteristic, then the logarithm transformation of possibilistic odds,  are considered as the observed outputs. The membership function of these observed outputs can be calculated from the defined membership function of  (2) and extension principle as follows:
In which  is a one-to-one function. So, there is one and only one  such that, therefore, .
The regression parameters were estimated using Least absolute deviations (LAD) and Least squares estimation (LSE) (32). It should be noted that the method of estimating the regression parameters and calculating the goodness of fit criteria was given in the appendix.
Results
Participants in the study included 18 children ages 6 to 17. The mean ± SD of children’s age was 10.44 ± 3.33 years. Approximately %22 of the children were girls. Gender, age (year) and raw score for each of the stereotypical movements, communication and social interaction subscales were considered as the crisp input variables and another therapist's opinion, who evaluated individuals, was recorded as the severity of the disorder as a fuzzy response variable in linguistic terms (Low, Moderate, High). Participants data are shown in Table 1.
To develop the relationship between possibilistic odds of the severity of the disorder and the above-mentioned factors, the proposed model is fitted:
Where = Gender, = Age,= Stereotypical movements, = Communication and = Social interaction. The results of LAD and LSE are provided as follows.
In summary, the estimated positive coefficients in the fuzzy logistic model indicate that the correspondence variable is related to an increase in possibilistic odds of struggling with a severe disorder, and negative coefficients indicate that the correspondence variable is related to a decrease in possibilistic odds of tussling with an intensive disorder.
The results of LAD and LSE estimation approaches and goodness of fit indices are given in Table 2.
Now, suppose there is a 12 years old boy with (). Then, according to model 6, the possibilistic odds of intense disorder for this person is obtained as:
 
This means that  = (−0.23,0.09,1.34), i.e., the logarithm of possibilistic odds for this case, is about 0.09 (a fuzzy number). And now, to calculate the estimated possibilistic odds using the extension principle we have:
This means that the possibilistic odds of severe disorder of this patient is “about 0.52".
 
Table 1: Fuzzy observations in Autism disorder and the values of related factors
No. Gender Age Stereotypical movements Communication Social interaction Possibility of disorder  
1 Male 6 18 4 31 High
2 Male 6 18 15 22 Moderate
3 Female 15 21 23 22 Moderate
4 Male 13 18 35 25 High
5 Male 15 22 23 27 Moderate
6 Female 10 7 3 11 Low
7 Male 10 24 28 16 Moderate
8 Male 11 22 38 19 Moderate
9 Male 15 10 13 13 Low
10 Male 17 12 21 20 Low
11 Male 6 14 14 31 High
12 Female 9 21 13 25 High
13 Male 9 35 18 33 High
14 Female 8 8 8 9 Moderate
15 Male 10 31 12 32 Moderate
16 Male 10 10 9 3 Moderate
17 Male 10 24 14 8 Moderate
18 Male 8 24 11 0 Moderate
 
Table 2: The estimations and goodness-of-fit values for the Autism Data
Estimates LAD LSE
(0.37 , 0.37 , 1.57) (2.53 , 2.53 , 2.53)
(-0.08 , -0.07 , -0.07) (-0.79 , -0.79 , -0.79)
(-0.36 , -0.36 , -0.35) (-0.49 , -0.49 , -0.37)
(0.1 , 0.1 , 0.1) (0.05 , 0.05 , 0.05)
(0.02 , 0.02 , 0.02) (0.097 , 0.097 , 0.097)
(0.1 , 0.1 , 0.1) (0.05 , 0.05 , 0.05)
0.0634 0.1255
 

Fig 1: Suggested definitions for

Discussion
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) recognized as the most serious and at the same time the most unknown childhood disorder (2, 3). Usually, Autism occurs in the early years of childhood and the violation of social relations and functioning is recognized as the most serious feature of this disorder (8). Given the various problems that this disorder can cause for the child, family and society and its increasing prevalence, the necessity of early screening and diagnosis and timely interventions are of particular importance (16), because it increases the possibility of receiving relevant and focused intervention services based on the specific educational and clinical needs of the child (19). In addition, some studies demonstrate that in many disorders the distinction between major and mild symptoms is related to "level", not "type" (18). Therefore, the use of tools such as GARS for the diagnostic and therapeutic purposes of this disorder would be useful (20, 29).
Nevertheless, caution should be exercised in classifying the severity of the disorder, which is based on linguistic terms, and then analyzing it, which is commonly used by logistic regression, since fuzzy logistic regression should be used if the assumptions of the logistic regression are not fulfilled due to the ambiguous nature of the linguistic terms or the values of the variables. Also in regression analysis, in the case when we have outliers, it is important to find estimation approaches which are robust to outliers (30). Choi and Buckly investigated the fuzzy regression analysis based on LAD approach, using α-cuts of fuzzy numbers (31). Taheri and Kelkinnama introduced two methods for constructing fuzzy regression model based on the LAD method, for crisp input-fuzzy output and fuzzy input-fuzzy output data (32, 33). Namdari et al. developed the LAD method for modeling and compared it with the LSE method and also represented new goodness of fit indices called Measure of performance based on fuzzy distance (Mp) (30).
In the present research, Least-squares estimation (LSE) and least absolute deviations (LAD) methods were exerted to estimate regression parameters of autism spectrum disorder data using fuzzy logistic regression. In this study, the values of Mp to compare the efficiencies of different fitting methods suggested that, LAD is much more efficient than LSE, which is in line with the results of Namdari's study (30).
Conclusion
When the severity of a disorder, such as the autism spectrum disorder, have levels based on linguistic terms, fuzzy logistic regression provides an appropriate alternative tool for modeling in a more flexible environment. In the current study, the goodness-of-fit criterion for the LAD (0.0634) and LSE (0.1255) methods indicated that the fuzzy logistic regression model was suitable for both estimation methods, yet the model estimated by LAD method is a more appropriate model because of the lower numerical value of goodness of fit than LSE method. The models derived from this study could be helpful in order to more accurately determine the severity of the disorder in young children, who are referred to rehabilitation centers, to begin the most proper treatment as soon as possible.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the therapists and co-workers of Parvarsh preschool and nongovernmental primary schools, as well as the families of the children, for their cooperation and patience in completing the questionnaires. The authors acknowledge their gratitude to Dr. M. Namdari, Dr. S. M. Taheri and Mr. M. Ghorbani for their precious guidance and also anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the article.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
None
Authors' contributions
All authors contributed equally to this work.
Type of Article: Original article | Subject: Bio-statistics
Received: 2019/02/7 | Accepted: 2019/04/10 | Published: 2019/07/1

References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub; 2013 May 22. [Google Scholar]
2. SARABI JM, Hasanadadi A, Mashhadi A, Asgharinekah M. The effects of parent education and skill training program on stress of mothers of children with autism. 2012. [Google Scholar]
3. Volkmar FR, Paul R, Klin A, Cohen DJ. Handbook of Autism and Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Assessment, Interventions, and Policy: Wiley; 2007. [Google Scholar]
4. Kanner L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nervous child. 1943;2(3):217-50. [Google Scholar]
5. Soto S, Linas K, Jacobstein D, Biel M, Migdal T, Anthony BJ. A review of cultural adaptations of screening tools for autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2015;19(6):646-61. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Howlin P, Asgharian A. The diagnosis of autism and Asperger syndrome: findings from a survey of 770 families. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 1999;41(12):834-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Esbati M, Roberts JM. Autism treatment and family support models review. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2009;7(1):44-9. [Google Scholar]
8. Pourhidar M, Dadkhah A. The Effects of Individual and Group Training on General Health and Stress of Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2015;13(4):110-5. [Google Scholar]
9. Rice C. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorders--Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, United States, 2006. 2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
10. Baio J. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders: Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 14 Sites, United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries. Volume 61, Number 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. [Google Scholar]
11. Baio J. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2010. 2014. [Google Scholar]
12. Bozorgnia A, Malekpour M, Abedi A, editors. Prevalence of autism in children 6 to 12 years old Shhrkrd 2009-2010. Regional Conference on Child and Adolescent Psychology; 2011. [Google Scholar]
13. Samadi SA, Mahmoodizadeh A, McConkey R. A national study of the prevalence of autism among five-year-old children in Iran. Autism. 2012;16(1):5-14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
14. Samadi SA, McConkey R. Screening for autism in Iranian preschoolers: Contrasting M-CHAT and a scale developed in Iran. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 2015;45(9):2908-16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
15. Rahbar Karbasdehi E, Abolghasemi A, Rahbar Karbasdehi F. Alexithymia and Personality Factors Among Students With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 2018;16(1):77-82. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
16. Vakilizadeh N, Abedi A, Mohseni Ezhiyeh A. Investigating Validity and Reliability of Early Screening for Autistic Traits-Persian Version (ESAT-PV) in Toddlers (Persian). Archives of Rehabilitation. 2017;18(3):182-93. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
17. Vakilizadeh N, Abedi A, Mohseni Ezhiyeh A, Pishghadam E. Effectiveness of family-based early intervention on the degree of joint attention (responding) of the children with autism spectrum disorder: A single-subject study. Journal of Rehabiltation. 2016;17(1):42-53. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
18. Ganji M. Abnormal psychology based on DSM-5. Tehran: savalan Publications. 2013:260-1.
19. Karimzadeh M, Baneshi AR, Dehghan Tezerjani M, Tayyebi Sough Z. Normalization of Pervasive Developmental Disorder Screening Test. Archives of Rehabilitation. 2018;19(2):116-25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
20. Ahmadi SJ, Hemmatian ST, Khalili Z. Investigation of the psychometric features of the GARS (persion). Research in Cognitive and Behavioral Journal. 2011;1:87-104. [Google Scholar]
21. Zadeh LA, editor Biological application of the theory of fuzzy sets and systems. The Proceedings of an International Symposium on Biocybernetics of the Central Nervous System; 1969: Little, Brown and Comp.
22. Zadeh LA. Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1973(1):28-44. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
23. Norris D, Pilsworth B, Baldwin J. Medical diagnosis from patient records-a method using fuzzy discrimination and connectivity analyses. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1987;23(1):73-87. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
24. Pourahmad S, Ayatollahi SMT, Taheri SM, Agahi ZH. Fuzzy logistic regression based on the least squares approach with application in clinical studies. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 2011;62(9):3353-65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
25. Pourahmad S, Ayatollahi T, Mohammad S, Taheri SM. Fuzzy logistic regression: a new possibilistic model and its application in clinical vague status. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2011;8(1):1-17. [Google Scholar]
26. Innocent PR, John RI. Computer aided fuzzy medical diagnosis. Information Sciences. 2004;162(2):81-104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Jafelice RM, de Barros LC, Bassanezi RC, Gomide F. Fuzzy modeling in symptomatic HIV virus infected population. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology. 2004;66(6):1597-620. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
28. Namdari M, Taheri SM, Abadi A, Rezaei M, Kalantari N, editors. Possibilistic logistic regression for fuzzy categorical response data. Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), 2013 IEEE International Conference on; 2013: IEEE. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
29. Ahmadi S, Safari T, Hemmatian M, Khalili Z. The psychometric properties of Gilliam autism rating scale (GARS) (Persian). Researches of Congnitive and Bihavioral Sciences. 2011(1):1. [Google Scholar]
30. Namdari M, Yoon JH, Abadi A, Taheri SM, Choi SH. Fuzzy logistic regression with least absolute deviations estimators. Soft Computing. 2015;19(4):909-17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
31. Choi SH, Buckley JJ. Fuzzy regression using least absolute deviation estimators. Soft Computing-A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications. 2008;12(3):257-63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
32. Kelkinnama M, Taheri S. Fuzzy least-absolutes regression using shape preserving operations. Information Sciences. 2012;214:105-20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
33. Taheri SM, Kelkinnama M. Fuzzy linear regression based on least absolute deviations. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2012;9.1. Association AP. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. [Google Scholar]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Jorjani Biomedicine Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb