Volume 7, Issue 1 (January-March 2019)                   Jorjani Biomed J 2019, 7(1): 31-38 | Back to browse issues page

DOI: 10.29252/jorjanibiomedj.7.1.31


XML Persian Abstract Print


1- Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
3- Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Groan, Iran
4- Psychiatric and Mental health Nursing Department, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran , maghsoudi@nm.mui.ac.ir
Abstract:   (636 Views)
Abstract
Background and objectives: Given its progressive nature in all life aspects, drug abuse threatens the health of individuals, families, and society and causes some economic, political and human damages to each society. In this regard, family is the first variable exposed to such a threat. Accordingly, the present study was to review the problems facing families of substance abusers.
Methods: In this study, the Scopus, Medline, SID, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases were surfed using keywords such as problems, substance abuse, addiction, family during 2000 to 2017. Finally, 30 full-text articles were selected.
Results: Studies have revealed that drug-related disorders affect the family system and members and bring family members different problems, including psychosocial, economic, physical, family and educational problems. These studies reported the psychological problems of family members as the most frequent one.
Conclusion: The present study indicated that family members with substance abusers face different problems in different aspects of their life; therefore, the need to expand prevention and treatment programs for such persons seems to be urgent.
 
Full-Text [PDF 986 kb]   (96 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Review Article | Subject: Health
Received: 2018/09/18 | Revised: 2019/08/12 | Accepted: 2019/03/3

References
1. Eatemadi A, G. Ebrahimi, Comparison of Mental Health of Children of Monogamous and Humorous Families. Woman in development and policity. Women's Research, 2010. 4(8): p. 26-35
2. Singh A. Strategies adopted by wives of addicts: A sociological study of women in rural Punjab, India. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 2010. 2(8): p. 162-170.
3. Mousavi S. The role of family function (based on McMaster model) in predicting conscientious attitudes and couples' agreement in families Qazvin. Quarterly Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 2013. 3(3): p. 402-418.
4. Jahangir p. Comparison of Family Performance and Marital Satisfaction in Married Women Working and Unemployed (Housewives) in Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Educational Management Research, 2012. 3(4): p. 177-192.
5. Ray T.G, Mertens J.R, Weisner C.T. The excess medical cost and health problems of family members of persons diagnosed with alcohol or drug problems. Medical care, 2007. 45(2): p. 116- 122. [DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000241109.55054.04]
6. Mancheri H, Heydari M, Khoddooshi Boroujeni M. Perceived Social Security in Addicted Families Referring to One of the Treatment Centers for the Treatment of Addiction in Gorgan. Journal of Health and Care., 2012. 14(4): p. 27-19.
7. Heydari J, Jafari, Hand Hosseini H. Assessment Social Mental status of Addicts in Sari city. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 2006. 52(16): p. 109-116.
8. Hojjati H. Mental health and its relationship with quality of life in addicts. Monthly Journal of Shaheed Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, 2009. 18(3): p. 207-214.
9. Sarrami H, Ghorbani M, Minooei M. Survey of Four Decades of Addiction Prevalence Researches in Iran. Research on Addiction, 2013. 7(26): p. 29-52.
10. Noghani F, Madadi A. Drug addiction and drug addiction lesson. Jamea Negar Publishing, 2006.
11. Mancheri H, heidari m, Ghodusi Borujeni M. Correlation of Psychosocial problems with perception of social support families with addicted member admitted. Journal of Nursing Education, 2013. 1(3): p. 1-9.
12. Copello A.G. Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug and alcohol review, 2005. 24(4): p. 369-385. [DOI:10.1080/09595230500302356]
13. Lander L, Howsare J, Byrne M. The impact of substance use disorders on families and children: from theory to practice. Social work in public health, 2013. 28(3-4): p. 194-205. [DOI:10.1080/19371918.2013.759005]
14. Mattoo S. Family burden with substance dependence: a study from India. Indian J Med Res 137, 2013: p. 704-711.
15. Keshavarz M, ghomrani A, Bagherian M. The role of the psychological orientation of addicts and the burden of their families on the survival of addiction treatment. Research in behavioral science., 2014. 12(1): p. 144-153.
16. Daley D.C. Family and social aspects of substance use disorders and treatment. Journal of food and drug analysis, 2013. 21(4): p. S73-S76. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfda.2013.09.038]
17. Choudhary M. A Qualitative Study to assess Perceived Burden among Caregivers of Client with Substance Dependence. International Journal of Nursing Education and Research, 2016. 4(2): p. 169-173. [DOI:10.5958/2454-2660.2016.00034.X]
18. Moriarty H. Exploring resilience in families living with addiction J of primary health care, 2011. 3(3): p. 210-217. [DOI:10.1071/HC11210]
19. Etemadi A, Farahani F.M. Comparison of Mental Health Status and Source of Control of Adolescent Girls in Addicted and Non-addicted Families. Quarterly Journal of Educational Development, 2014. 4(16): p. 137-147.
20. Dalwandi A, Sadr Sadat S.A. Survey on Psychosocial Problems of Adolescent Fathers. Quarterly Journal of Rehabilitation, 2001. 2(1): p. 26-34.
21. Mohammad khani P. The express in of psychiatric symptom in women with addicted husband. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 2010. 6(23): p. 237-245.
22. Salehi B. The comparison of the psychiatric disorders between opium addicts' families referring to opium withdrawal clinics and nonaddicts' families referring to blood transmission centers. Arak University of Medical Sciences Journal, 2012. 15(3): p. 32-8.
23. Aghabakhshi H. Addiction and Family Anatomy: A Social Worker's Approach to Community Issues and Disadvantages Publications of the University of Social Welfare & Rehabilitation. 2009.
24. Mancheri H, Jafari S.Y. Psychosocial problems in addicted families. Taali publication, 2014.
25. Ray G.T, Mertens J.R, Weisner C. Family members of people with alcohol or drug dependence: health problems and medical cost compared to family members of people with diabetes and asthma. Addiction, 2008. 104(2): p. 203-214. [DOI:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02447.x]
26. Lee K.M.T. Stress‐coping morbidity among family members of addiction patients in Singapore. Drug and alcohol review, 2011. 30(4): p. 441-447. [DOI:10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00301.x]
27. Raheb G, Eghlima M. Social Work Methods in the Prevention and Treatment of Addiction. University of Rehabilitation Sciences and Social Welfare. 2010.
28. Aman Allahi , A., et al., Investigating Relationship between Family Function and Personality Characteristics with Readiness of Addiction. Two Quarterly Journal of Applied Counseling, 2013. 3(1): p. 63-76.
29. Mohammadifar, M., Talebi, Aand Tabatabai, S.M. Effect of life skills training on family function in women with addicted spouse. Drug addiction study checklist, 2010. 4(16): p. 25-39.
30. Mancheri H. Psychosocial Problems of Families Living with an Addicted Family Member. Iran Journal of Nursing, 2013. 26(83): p. 48-56.
31. Schafer G. Family functioning in families with alcohol and other drug addiction Social policy journal of new zealand j 2011. 37: p. 1-17.
32. Naimi A. The Effectiveness of Family-Based Education on Mental Health and Resilience of Women with Addicted Wife. Woman in Development and Politics, 2015. 1(13): p. 40-52.
33. Velleman R, Templeton, L. Alcohol, drugs and the family: results from a long-running research programme within the UK. European Addiction Research, 2003. 9(3): p. 103-112 [DOI:10.1159/000070978]